Since they are 3 bedrooms....I would guess they will be the same price as a grand villa.....or at least $800 a night. I just guessing of course, but that's my guess.
Holy Shiva!!!!!!
Even if there was a 40% off code... Crimmey!
Since they are 3 bedrooms....I would guess they will be the same price as a grand villa.....or at least $800 a night. I just guessing of course, but that's my guess.
I dont think they'll be quite THAT much, as I don't think they include laundry facilities for example and ... my guess .. is that they won't be furnished as opulently as the grand villas.
Grand Villas sleep up to 12. The max occupancy of the treehouse is eight. Two per bedroom and one pull out sofa.
Not to mention, the Grand Villas include a lot more space than the Treehouse units allow for.
The Treehouses compare quite well with the Fort Wildnerness cabins and I suspect they'll be slightly more than the cabins are currently. Probably closer to the 400$ a night range.
Just my guess.
The old ones are being torn down (according to the permit) but ALL 60 will be rebuilt!!! And as I noted, they look remarkably similar .. I suspect the new ones will be more energy efficient and better construction.
The international CM's have been or will be moved to the same dorms as North American CP students in other parts of the property.
I'm thinking there is a stackable washer and dryer near the entry door. What do you think?
I'm thinking there is a stackable washer and dryer near the entry door. What do you think?
Seems like the rates were similar for the Fairway Villas and the Treehouses....although I believe the Treehouses were more expensive.
In 1986 the price was the same for both. I was originally booked for the Treehouses and stayed there a week. At the end of the week I could not stand to go to an offsite hoteland decided I could afford another two nights.
The Treehouses were full up and we had to move to the Villas for our last two nights. Paid the same at both. We were pleased with both.
![]()
That was me.
There is a table in the ADA standards for hotels that says how many rooms need to be accessible, based on the total number of rooms in the resort.
For a hotel of 51 to 75 rooms, 3 would have to be meet minimum accessibilty; things like grab bars, raised seat toilets and minimum door width of at least 32 inches (most regular hotel doorways are 34 to 36 inches wide), . Only 1 would be required to have a roll-in shower. They might have to do a little rearranging to fit in a roll in shower, but the roll in shower bathrooms in the DVC rooms are the same size as the regular bathrooms with showers.
It would be relatively easy to provide access to the raised entry area. They could put an elevator the goes from ground level to the entry level deck or they could wrap a ramp that leads to the deck around the outside of the building. They would only have to do that with a total of 4 rooms (3, plus 1 roll in shower room).
Some of the other accessibility requirements would not change the design - like 3 rooms would need to be supplied with things like strobe light fire alarms and features for people who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Things like faucets, light switches and door knobs that can be operated with one hand, higher electrical outlets and lower wall switches were not always common when the standards were written, but they are pretty common parts of 'universal design' now.
So, handicapped accessibility would be no problem.
Question: IF these units were simply added to SSR inventory, would any of THEM actually need to be ADA compliant? Or could they simply convert a number of "other" SSR rooms into ADA compliant rooms to satisfy the requirement.
If the treehouses functionally become a PART of SSR, would in essence just become another section like Congress Park or Carousel, I'm unsure if they'd need to convert ANY of the ACTUAL treehouses to be ADA compliant and still satisfy the letter of the law. Would they?