bicker said:
I just checked. The danger zone begins at 82 degrees, for pathogens such as Naegleria fowleri. So lowering the temperature of the pools further below 82 degrees is almost surely a matter of safety, given that the effect of the sun could warm the pool beyond what the heaters achieve.
The problem with this hypothesis is the fact that, if you are speaking of
Naegleria fowleri or other microorganisms, is that we are not speaking of heated lakes and streams. We are speaking of swimming pools, which, unless they are woefully and neglegently maintained, tend to be chlorinated. Extra chlorinated, I'm sure, if you are an organization the size and breadth of Disney.
bicker said:
I would chalk it up to a little mob mentality. Many folks are getting very upset about something which most every other resort in the world could change without most guests even noticing.
The difference, however, is that the people complaining at least on this board are 'part-owners' of these resorts. At least they are for 40-50 years, and they were neither consulted or alerted to this change? Many of these owners might have seen the allure of heated pools in off-season months to be an influential selling point. Recently, I went ahead and decided to put down a deposit and am now waiting on the paperwork to come in for me to finalize the deal.
I live in Washington, DC, which tends to have cold winters. On top of that, I'm someone who tends to travel off-season due to annual commitments which occur on-season. So, the whole "heated pools during winter" thing was a major selling point. Will it kill the deal? Probably not, but it has definitely given me pause if it is a harbinger of things to come. When my paperwork does arrive, I may very well talk to my guide or someone else to get the 411 of what's going on.
And as someone else said, when you consider how much money Disney spends each day and night on energy costs (Spectromagic, anyone?), it is impossible to see how they are really saving much money at all. Actually, I'd like to see the numbers on that, seeing that I am not sure exactly how much energy it takes to heat those pools (is it an exponential thing as bodies of water get larger? etc).
I think what upsets a lot of people is more that it was done 'on the sly.' No body likes that, whoever they are. If you are going to do something, be honest and open about it. Don't try to get away with it, especially with people who are the ones who you are sharing the costs of upkeep with.
My personal guess is that it could be one of those things where the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing. Look at most large organizations. It happens all the time. Department A does one thing, not realizing how it could affect Department B. Who knows. It may just be an honest mistake couched in the surface of trying to save money. As 'part-owners,' it can be argued, that
DVC members are the checks and balances to ensure that Disney keeps efficiency from interfering with quality, etc etc.
Or my name is Pollyanna. I dunno.
P.S. I just spent like... an hour and a half getting this post to post due to some weird "can't post URLs" error. And, as you can see, no URLs! The problem seemed to come from one sentence which wouldn't parse through the bbs. ARGH! I am blaming this problem on the lack of heated pools also.
