If we could all take off our tin foil conspiracy caps for a moment... McDonalds used to offer a 2.4 oz serving of fries. They are now offering a 2.3 oz combo serving of apples/fries(1.1 oz of fries/1.2 oz of apples). I would hardly call the .1 oz reduction a "scam in the name of health". Offering a meal with fewer calories and saturated fat is not a scam, it is a step in the right direction.
Again with the comments that anyone who doesn't see things your way must not be thinking clearly.
Right. It asked for thoughts and I have been giving mine. I am not annoyed. I am simply countering your thoughts which I do not agree with.
To me, this statement doesn't make sense. You say you do not want the corporations "making those decisions". Prior to this, the same corporation was
making the decision to serve a 2.4 oz serving of fries. Why are you okay with the corporation
making the decision to serve a 2.4 oz serving of fries, but when they add a serving of fruit to the meal, you are bothered and don't think it right for the corporation to
make a decision on what to serve to the consumer. It makes no sense.
McDonald's offer fries automatically with their Happy Meal. If the consumer wanted apples instead, they could request and receive. Simple and seems to have worked pretty well since 2004. I said they should leave it as it is and let the customer choose what they want. McDonald's is not my source for healthy eating. My opinion. Hardly bothered.
But look how upset you are over this minor "apple" change. If they made the changes you suggested, wouldn't you be arguing that they have no right "making those decisions". It seems to me that no matter what they do, you will not be satisfied. In one breath, you are saying they are not doing enough. Then, you are saying they shouldn't be "making those decisions".