We will agree to disagree on the mechanics of the deal as neither one of us is at liberty to discuss it in full on an open board. Ultimately, the proof is in the pudding.I'm very familiar with their licensing deals and their portfolio. The agreement is actually not complicated at all. It's a very standard industry licensing deal. I didn't say there was anything wrong with it, but it is not in any way similar to the rest of the Morimoto restaurants (in ownership, operating model, quality, price, or any other way). The only thing alike is the name and even that, he was careful to distinguish by using the very odd "Morimoto Asia" vs. his usual "Morimoto"
Celebrity chefs tend to operate in some mix of restaurants where they have an ownership stake and operating role and ones where they license out their name. There is often (but not always) a very clear difference in quality between the two models. For chefs that have operated in both models (e.g., Scott Conant), there is often a massive difference between the 2 that is very obvious. Morimoto is one where anyone who has been to both types can tell you there is a big difference.
I'm not sure why you are asking if I think he operates all the restaurants on his own, when I'm the one who said he doesn't operate this one???
I see no difference in the quality of the dishes at any of his properties I’ve been at; this isn’t Frontera Cocina.
As for my question? It was rhetorical and not meant to be a point for debate.