JimmyV
Por favor manténganse alejado de las puertas.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2008
- Messages
- 8,060
Honestly you must not "understand" that "permanent" doesn't always mean forever.
I guess I'll wait for actual 'doom and gloom' information and how its actually affecting guests before going on tirades about Disney's quality, how this can't possibly be for maintenance, and how they should just man up and pay the cost to keep it running. I guess thats why I find this thread so funny.
Fine in theory. But it fails in practice. If you are going to WDW in the next year, the fact that this may not be really permanent is of no value to you, except academically. Or are you saying that you don't think that they will actually implement the change today? For people who are traveling this fall when park hours are shortest, they will be affected. No two ways about it. 5 years from now? Who knows. But should we hold off on the debate as to whether or not this is a good change until 5 years from now? It seems as if you do not believe that this change will be implemented, or that the change is already scheduled to have a sunset period, despite any announcement of that nature. Well, if you are going to wait around three years for the reversion back to status qua ante just so that you can say "I told you so", then more power to you. But I don't see how that applies to the people who actually will be affected during those three years.