bsnyder said:Are they at least equally incompetent?
Laugh O. Grams said:F.Y.I...
just heard it on the radio...no confirmation online as of yet.
C.Ann said:----------------
Yup.. I think I might have the same list that you do..

ThAnswr said:You just can't help yourself, but I'm feeling generous at the moment, sooooo to answer your question:
Various people rose to their level of incompetency at different times.

ducklite said:All I'm going to say about this whole mess is that these people WORK FOR YOU! Remember this in November. Remember those who supported and endorsed the people you are all so angry with right now. VOTE and make the changes that you feel are needed. Vote for the right PERSON, NOT PARTY.
And plan on going to Jazz Fest in 2006
Anne
I don't know if you've seen them yet... but they came out last Friday!such that the talking points in the next few days will focus on how every bit of the federal government's falure was his personal responsibility, when it was really more a matter of philosophy than individual competence
ThAnswr said:It should be obvious that many of these people do not believe the government works for them. They have swallowed the BS, hook, line, and sinker that government is the problem and government is bad. And the disconnect gets wider and wider.
No bad government, as exhibited these last 10 days or so, is the problem.
Solution: Stop voting for people who do not believe in the institution of government and who don't believe government can do a competent job. When you vote for these "government is bad" people and put them in office, they rise to your low expectations. They tell the voters they're screw-ups and then the voter is surprised that they lived up to their hype.
I say, if a candidate doesn't believe in government and doesn't believe government can help solve problems, why the hell would anyone want that kind of a moron representing them.
You get the government you voted for. Vote for people who will do a good job and believe that there is a sacred trust between the citizen and their government.
bsnyder said:I understand the argument you're making here, but I can't help but disagree with you.
bsnyder said:We've seen three levels of government completely fail the people they were elected to serve. And those levels cut across partisan lines. Are you saying that ALL of those people didn't believe that government can help solve problems?
bsnyder said:The result we're seeing from FEMA is what happens with a beauracracy - the bigger and more remote it gets from the people it's intended to serve, the more inefficient and bogged down it gets.
ThAnswr said:Then continue voting for the ones who do not believe in government, who do not believe government can help solve problems, and who do believe "government should be shrunk to the size that can fit into a bathtub and then drowned". See where it gets you.
Cut across partisan lines my eyeball. The Republicans have made it their mantra, going back to Reagan, that government is bad and government is the problem. Bad government is the problem.
No what you are seeing from FEMA is bad government. FEMA should never have been rolled into Homeland Security because Homeland Security was focused on terrorism, not natural disasters. FEMA should never have been headed by someone who has absolutely no qualifications for the postion other than the fact he's a good Republican. You are watching bad government in action.
You wanted the "government is bad and government is the problem" folks in office, and look where it got you.
Here's a fresh idea: vote for people who believe in the institution of government and believe government can help solve problems.
A couple of questions...Here's a fresh idea: vote for people who believe in the institution of government and believe government can help solve problems.
ducklite said:All I'm going to say about this whole mess is that these people WORK FOR YOU! Remember this in November. Remember those who supported and endorsed the people you are all so angry with right now. VOTE and make the changes that you feel are needed. Vote for the right PERSON, NOT PARTY.
And plan on going to Jazz Fest in 2006
Anne

LoraJ said:I'm thinking about it! If we don't do Mardi Gras, we may do Jazz fest.![]()
ThAnswr said:No what you are seeing from FEMA is bad government. FEMA should never have been rolled into Homeland Security because Homeland Security was focused on terrorism, not natural disasters. FEMA should never have been headed by someone who has absolutely no qualifications for the postion other than the fact he's a good Republican. You are watching bad government in action.
.
Geoff_M said:A couple of questions...
1) Which side of the aisle was it that called for the creation of a DHS, with all of the various related governmental agencies reporting into it (i.e. the genesis of FEMA supposedly getting lost in the shuffle)?
2) Who initially resisted the move?
Geoff_M said:I don't know if you've seen them yet... but they came out last Friday!
![]()
Charade said:And NOLA got a Mayor that used to be on cable TV.
bsnyder said:Does that mean that he thinks government is bad, and should be drowned in a bathtub?