BrianL
Doom Buggy Driver
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
- Messages
- 27,220
With respect, I don't agree that torn/sloppy clothing is the same as what he did. That's old school way of thinking; almost down to a T.
Of course an interviewer could still judge you and choose not to hire you but in today's age tattoos aren't just seen as "you don't care about your appearance do you" (the eye dying like I said is quite extreme still) like they used to be. though facial tattoos are on a more gradual acceptance here. I don't disagree that an employer may choose not to hire him and there's legally nothing wrong with that. But ethnically I think the tide is shifting. Snap judgements are snap judgements. We're becoming better at not making those, we've still got a few more generations I think before it really is prevalent though.
The "old school" way of thinking is not always bad. Also, not all tatoos are created equal - the same for clothing choices. I might not think too poorly of a guy who interviews and his tie clashes with his suit just a little versus a guy who is wearing torn up jeans. A few tatoos wouldn't affect my judgement as much as what this guy has done, and there is a difference. There are degrees to things and we don't have to accept everything outright. I am also not saying there is anything wrong with an employer who does want to hire him - it's entirely their decision.
Last edited: