lillygator
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2003
- Messages
- 32,741
yes I think it was rude.
and a little odd to invite past coworkers.....
and a little odd to invite past coworkers.....
Count us in as people who would definitely send our regrets............I dont know why people do not understand that workers DO NOT want to spend their days and NIGHTS with their co-workers!!!! Newsflash-we have lives OUTSIDE of work! When the work day ends, it is time to go HOME.
Its 45 PAST coworkers who probably don't know anyone besides their fellow coworkers and the man of honor. No, I don't think most people LOVE their past coworkers. I think most PAST coworkers aren't invited to life events anyway, only friends. Coworkers aren't friends, but some friends are coworkers.
Well, actually, it's a greater breach. It's extremely rude to call a hostess and ask to bring a guest. It's even ruder to NOT call, and instead to just show up with extra people.
Wow! I didn't expect to receive so many responses!!! Thanks to everyone who took the time to comment!
To answer some questions:
The past coworkers that I invited are still very good friends with my husband. They still get together regularly for dinners, parties, etc. There are 5 from one office and 7 from the other. Since they are all in the same line of work they still go to conferences with each other and help each other out with work problems, etc. They are still very active in his life.
Since I am not familiar with the people at his current place of employment I called and asked his assistant to help me with the guest list. I told her to include the 5 people in his immediate office and other people who are close friends with him. He has mentioned a few names over and over again, so I thought the guest list would be about 10 people. Well, because of office politics, etc. the guest list grew to 30 people.
Someone asked me how I would feel if my husband was invited to a party without me, and honestly, I wouldn't really care. Especially if it was a work related event...
BUT, obviously I am in the minority on that one, so...
I will be sending out a follow up invitation that includes guests. The most important thing is that people have a good time, and obviously people would have more fun if they can bring someone special to celebrate with.
Thanks again for all of the replies! I will let you know how the party goes!
Well, actually, it's a greater breach. It's extremely rude to call a hostess and ask to bring a guest. It's even ruder to NOT call, and instead to just show up with extra people.
I agree. Ettiquette aside, I don't really see the big deal in being away from a SO for a few hours.I am probably in the minority, so probably my opinion doesn't count. But if my spouse (or kids or dog, etc) aren't invited somewhere, I don't even question it. If I liked the person enough to care about the celebration, I would HAPPILY go on my own. I LIVE with my spouse for crying out loud - a few hours without him to give me contrats to an old (or current) friend wouldn't bother me in the least.
I seriously don't get people who are so joined at the hip that they can't go to a social function without their spouse. I agree that a WEDDING is different, but this isn't a wedding. It's just a party.
Ordinarily I would agree with this, but not in this case. It's such a huge breach of etiquette to only invite half of a social unit that I think it's understandable for people to be confused by the invitation. .
Wow! I didn't expect to receive so many responses!!! Thanks to everyone who took the time to comment!
To answer some questions:
The past coworkers that I invited are still very good friends with my husband. They still get together regularly for dinners, parties, etc. There are 5 from one office and 7 from the other. Since they are all in the same line of work they still go to conferences with each other and help each other out with work problems, etc. They are still very active in his life.
Since I am not familiar with the people at his current place of employment I called and asked his assistant to help me with the guest list. I told her to include the 5 people in his immediate office and other people who are close friends with him. He has mentioned a few names over and over again, so I thought the guest list would be about 10 people. Well, because of office politics, etc. the guest list grew to 30 people.
Someone asked me how I would feel if my husband was invited to a party without me, and honestly, I wouldn't really care. Especially if it was a work related event...
BUT, obviously I am in the minority on that one, so...
I will be sending out a follow up invitation that includes guests. The most important thing is that people have a good time, and obviously people would have more fun if they can bring someone special to celebrate with.
Thanks again for all of the replies! I will let you know how the party goes!
This is why nobody will agree on the right or wrong answer here. I, personally, don't consider myself half of a social unit. I'm a single social unit all by myself, thank you.I'll very happily share the fun with my spouse
IF he is invited and if it's something that interests him. He's my favorite companion, but I don't consider him "half" of me in any way. I never bought into that "you complete me" stuff, though, so I'm sure that makes me a crummy spouse.
It's such a huge breach of etiquette to only invite half of a social unit that I think it's understandable for people to be confused by the invitation.
Ordinarily I would agree with this, but not in this case. It's such a huge breach of etiquette to only invite half of a social unit that I think it's understandable for people to be confused by the invitation. They have two choices when they receive an invitation that only includes one half of the unit. They can assume that maybe the person sending the invitation just figured that everyone would know that spouses were of course invited - but since they don't know for sure and it would be rude to show up with an uninvited guest, they should call to clarify. Or, they can assume the worst of their host - that the person was extremely rude and only invited part of the social unit. I think in that situation, it's worse to assume that your host is rude. It seems better to me if you assume they just made a mistake on the invitation, and to call and make sure. Just showing up with your spouse without first clarifying with the host would be very rude, though.
In any case other than the host failing to invite both halves of a social unit, I think it's incredibly rude to call and ask if you can bring an univited guest with you.
I think this is the big difference in the responses. Obviously, many folks view themselves as "half" of a social unit. Of course inviting half a unit would be rude, kinda like inviting half of a pair of Siamese twins.
In my house, Bob and Jane are each individual social units. Do we do many, many things together? OF COURSE. Are we capable of enjoying ourselves as individual social units? HECK YEAH!!!
I'm not sure it's as much a matter of how people see themselves, as it is a matter of how focused people are on the "rules" of etiquette. I view myself as an individual and I'm happy to do things without my husband, just as he does things without me. We certainly aren't joined at the hip. But according to the rules of etiquette a married couple is viewed as a "social unit". If you are having an event and including some couples (as opposed to a shower or something with only one gender) then you are supposed to include both members of all social units, rather than picking and choosing only some couples and inviting one member of other couples. Of course this is only the case if you are concerned with following the "rules" of etiquette, which of course not everyone is. But if you choose not to, you may inadvertantly hurt or offend those who do care about things like that.