In that case, I'd take a cautious approach. If your company has any decent auditors, they will certainly look carefully at any self-dealing expense item.dpuck1998 said:It has to do with being a "company" trip and an expense account![]()
dpuck1998 said:Let me expound. The company belongs to my inlaws, they prefer to expense the trip so "auditors" are not a concern. I'm just curious if what we could charge that is not to high. They will just cut us a check for the amount and I'll take care of all the reservations, etc.
So I have a question that is completely divergent from the OP. Why would the cost per point vary around a peak time period since the number of points required for a reservation is already higher? Seems like the cost per point should be pretty constant, but I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole idea, so there could be things I'm not considering.Chuck S said:That being the case, I would stick with $10 per point. That way, on the off chance they are audited for expenses by the IRS, you can show them via the DIS that $10 appears to be the current avarage per point for a rental. Unless they are traveling during a peak week (Christmas, Spring Break, etc.)
dpuck1998 said:What is about the highest I can reasonably ask for them?
Blue&Gold said:One way to find out is to charge more than what others are charging, and see if anyone bites...
dpuck1998 said:Let me expound. The company belongs to my inlaws, they prefer to expense the trip so "auditors" are not a concern. I'm just curious if what we could charge that is not to high. They will just cut us a check for the amount and I'll take care of all the reservations, etc.
ITA, though I don't know if you have to put in the 25% discount. Using the rack rate is much "cleaner" from a business accounting standpoint, and probably gives you a higher price.DebbieB said:I would take the rack rate, maybe 25% off. If you have to prove the charge, just screen print the rate page from disneyworld.com.
dpuck1998 said:If they get audited by the IRS they have a lot more problems than this issue![]()