TiggerPiglet
<font color=CC33CC>Still stumped<br><font color=gr
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2002
- Messages
- 3,523
I wonder if Charlie could be "infected" since he was acting totally weird and, from what we saw, had not started using again. Maybe Charlie was "infected" with these dreams of Aaron to get Claire to baptise Aaron so he would be considered "good" and then the others could take him. **PLEASE NOTE I'm not saying if you are not baptised you aren't good, I'm just saying this for the purposes of the show.**
I thought the scenes with Sawyer and Hurley were so funny. When Sawyer yelled "Hey Libby" and then walked into his little hut leaving Hurley sitting there was hysterical.
I don't get why Locke kept the statues, is that to somehow keep Charlie under control somehow? I was a little confused last night. I agree with others, this episode seemed really out of place and didn't answer anything for me.
I thought the scenes with Sawyer and Hurley were so funny. When Sawyer yelled "Hey Libby" and then walked into his little hut leaving Hurley sitting there was hysterical.
I don't get why Locke kept the statues, is that to somehow keep Charlie under control somehow? I was a little confused last night. I agree with others, this episode seemed really out of place and didn't answer anything for me.

I was never into Sawyer before until last week when he told Zeke that if he touched a hair on Kate's head. Yeah, he plays the tough guy, but he cares about Kate. At first I wanted Kate to end up with Charlie, but Charlie actually has more issues than Sawyer (maybe).
