SL6827
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2017
- Messages
- 10,608
Maybe so.I have a feeling Disney is going to make it nice enough that you will want to hang out at the tower instead of the main resort.
Maybe so.I have a feeling Disney is going to make it nice enough that you will want to hang out at the tower instead of the main resort.
As a Poly resale owner, I hope you are right. And if I'm extra lucky and everyone flocks to the tower, maybe the Lava pool will become the new quiet pool.I have a feeling Disney is going to make it nice enough that you will want to hang out at the tower instead of the main resort.
Disney needs to install railroad tracks between the tower and the rest of the Polynesian. And make the 'elite' tower people feel disgusted and shamed if they cross the railroad tracks to the 'lesser' side.I honestly have faith that Disney will make it look great. But adding that many more people to that resort, I believe, could ruin it.
Is there anything in the plans that suggests there will be much space for hanging out at the tower? I was assuming the ratio of rooms to public facilities was pretty low.I have a feeling Disney is going to make it nice enough that you will want to hang out at the tower instead of the main resort.
Oh lawd,Disney needs to install railroad tracks between the tower and the rest of the Polynesian. And make the 'elite' tower people feel disgusted and shamed if they cross the railroad tracks to the 'lesser' side.![]()
Any bets on whether or not Poly 2 association will be announced during condo association meeting today?
For anyone joining late, allow me to summarize the thread:I’m 50/50 on it. I am waiting for the report on whether the same slide as last year is used which was reported to have PVB on it.
If that slide has been corrected, I think it’s a big hint it’s new. If not, it’s the same.
But, I am hoping that they talk about both FW and Poly in more detail.
I’m 50/50 on it. I am waiting for the report on whether the same slide as last year is used which was reported to have PVB on it.
If that slide has been corrected, I think it’s a big hint it’s new. If not, it’s the same.
But, I am hoping that they talk about both FW and Poly in more detail.
Yep. Beat me to it. Wow is all I can say. I've said for months I'll be shocked if they miss a chance to restrict all those points. Color me shocked. Really casts doubt on their belief in the strategy long term.Chang: “Our plans right now are for the new tower to be part of the existing Polynesian Resort.” Looks like theres our answer hopefully.
Is that an answer though? It was not the "existing Polynesian Resort association". That answer very much could mean shared amenities, shared lobby, etc. Could argue that BRV and CCV are the same "Wilderness Lodge Resort".Chang: “Our plans right now are for the new tower to be part of the existing Polynesian Resort.” Looks like theres our answer hopefully.
Also true, My God trying to get a straight answer out of these people... But I think it's just a quirk in wording. He did say "part of existing" so I'll assume same association until the actual documents are shownIs that an answer though? It was not the "existing Polynesian Resort association". That answer very much could mean shared amenities, shared lobby, etc. Could argue that BRV and CCV are the same "Wilderness Lodge Resort".
The question was specific to new or existing associations though. It might be a highly legalese answer but in terms of answering the question asked, it seems like they are saying same association.Is that an answer though? It was not the "existing Polynesian Resort association". That answer very much could mean shared amenities, shared lobby, etc. Could argue that BRV and CCV are the same "Wilderness Lodge Resort".
For that exact reason I think the wording had to be chosen very carefully. They had to know this question was coming today so I'm sure they rehearsed what the answer would be. I think they answered strategically knowing that response allows them to go either way.Also true, My God trying to get a straight answer out of these people... But I think it's just a quirk in wording. He did say "part of existing" so I'll assume same association until the actual documents are shown