I haven't seen the ads you're referring to. Were those ads actually sponsored by the Obama campaign?
No. What is interesting is that folks who claim that the Republican campaign should be held faultless with regard to the irresponsible ads of their supporters fail to grant the same consideration to the Democratic campaign. It's that old Republican campaign double-standard; they can do no wrong, and the other side can do no right.
The reality is that only objective evidence matters, which is why I do
not factor John McCain's history of cancer in when I post the objective estimate of Palin succeeding him as President. We don't have an independent evaluation of the cancer, so for objective comparisons, like likelihood of dying, we have to accept the information we do have available. Yet, even then, that old Republican campaign double-standard refused to acknowledge just how much more likely Palin would become President if McCain was elected, and instead they treat every negative insinuation, every bit of negative innuendo, and every subjective negative implication associated with Obama as gospel truth. It is duplicitous conduct of intellectual dishonesty, plain and simple.
Both sides are engaging in personal attacks. McCain/Palin started it, so they lose standing there, but after that, it is all noise. Voters are correct to ignore all personal attacks, and evaluate the candidates solely on their positions and platforms.
If you'd provide a link I'd appreciate it. I personally think McCain is in grave danger of dying in office if he's elected because of the type of cancer he had/has. It's a personal belief because my own brother (a retired U.S. Army Colonel) died from melanoma that was originally staged as I believe Senator McCain's 2nd cancer was staged.
Fair enough, but we don't have enough information to factor that into the evaluation. Instead, we can only go on the objective data, which is that his chances of dying in office, if elected, would be about 30%. Of course, that's far far far more than enough to be critically concerned about the possibility of a Palin ascendency.