The way Air France-KLM have acted these past few months is absolutely disgusting.
That is rather a broad blanket statement. KLM scheduled an humanitarian repatriation flight, which allowed my young adult son to return from Ecuador to the U.K. in March, so they are not all bad.
Also, I am not sure that it is always right to demand that other parties assume the risk, loss, consequences of something such as a pandemic. There has to be some balance.
Perhaps after this more people will take the time to read the small print of their contracts, buy decent
travel insurance and/ or flexible airfares?
Also, if we all demand immediate refunds from airlines and as a result many face bankruptcy, how will that impact future airfares? Surely if demand for worldwide travel remains the same but there are fewer airlines/routes/ seats available on aeroplanes, consumers will face far higher ticket prices? So aren’t we hurting ourselves by not compromising and being reasonable?
I don’t think that we can say, ‘there is a pandemic, I have a contract with XY, it isn’t my fault or XY’s fault but nevertheless I want XY to bear all the loss and I want to bear none of it.’
Airlines could operate the flights empty and then say to consumers, ‘you chose not to fly because of the U.K. FCO advisory, you also chose to purchase a less expensive, non refundable refundable flight, so, well basically.... tough!’.
Just playing Devil’s Advocate here but I do believe that there should be some middle ground.