. . . He teared up a bit and said "but mom, I'm a good boy".
So are we bad parents or do you also not buy things on their lists?? . . .
I would never try to buy EVERYTHING that the child writes down. It would give the child the idea that I'd do it again next year and the next year . . . and then what would I do when she wants a pony or a sports car or something else I can't produce? We're pretty indulgent at Christmas (whereas during the rest of the year we're quick to say, "You want it? How much money do you have?"), but I think it's good parenting NOT to buy everything the child requests.
I do try to get the child's #1 and #2 wish (assuming it's practical). I get them a few things from their wish list, and I get them a few things that they don't expect.
Some things just aren't practical. I would never buy Uggs or a leather jacket for a kid who's still growing. I would never buy a new ipod for a kid who has an almost-new one. Other things go against my own ideas of right and wrong. For example, I am not putting TVs in kids' bedrooms (don't care if I'm the last parent on the planet who feels this way). My kids are teens now, and they might well request some movies that I wouldn't allow. Those are just a few examples of things that I personally wouldn't buy for Christmas gifts -- I don't want to feel backed into a corner by a list.
In most cases, I do try to make those #1 and #2 gifts EXACTLY the item they're hoping for. For example, if one of my kids really, really, really wanted the Ipod Touch (which seems to be "the thing" on this particular thread), I'd drop a hint to her that I'd be willing to get it -- but that it would mean very, very little else under the tree. That'd give her a chance to consider whether she really was willing to sacrafice those other wishes for that one item. I know that I personally would usually rather have THE ITEM instead of a pile of junky things, but I try to hint to the kids to gauge their interest level.
This year my oldest chose to get her class ring as her big Christmas gift. She's 16, so I told her up front that choosing the ring would mean that she'd get little else, and that her sister would get much more on Christmas morning. She was fine with that. Also, she had a choice of a basic ring for less than $100 (but she didn't get to make any choices on it) or exactly the ring she wanted. She chose to get exactly the ring she wanted. But I'm not waiting 'til Christmas morning to tell her these things; I don't want her to see her sister get a big pile of things, while she sits there with 2-3 tiny packages and a disappointed face. Actually, one of her packages is a tiny jewelry box with a note saying that I hope she's enjoying her ring -- it's just a reminder, "Hey, you already got the big item."
We don't consider presents a reward for good behavior at Christmas. Presents are something you get because we love you and because we celebrate Christmas. Connecting them too strongly to good behavior could easily backfire. Suppose you have a financial setback and next year's Christmas
has to be a lean one -- does that imply to the kids that their behavior is not as good as it was last year? What if they're comparing their Christmas haul to their friend's gifts, and one kid gets a whole lot more than the other? Is he a better kid? Kids DO pick up these unintended messages, so it's a whole lot better to make Christmas gifts a "because I love you" thing.
To me, Christmas is more about being together and making memories.
In our family, Christmas is about Jesus first . . . family, presents, parties, good food, and fun traditions are all wonderful, but we try very hard to keep them secondary.