I've been reading about the work of Dr. Walter Kempner of Duke University. He might have been the first physician to show type 2 diabetes can respond and be put into remission through diet. He created a rice diet, very popular in its day, that in the first stage had a person just eating rice, fruit, and sugar. The person also took a few supplements such as vitamin A, which I'm guessing was cod liver oil. To the surprise of many on the rice diet, blood sugar levels dropped, great weight loss was sometimes seen, and diabetes complications frequently went away. You can read more about Dr. Kempner, and see a few pictures of patients before and after, in this article by Denise Minger.
http://rawfoodsos.com/2015/10/06/in-defense-of-low-fat-a-call-for-some-evolution-of-thought-part-1/
I was curious why the vitamin A was given. I think I might have found a possible reason recently. I found a few articles with mention that diabetics have difficulty converting plant beta carotene into vitamin A. Most people can make the conversion apparently, but for diabetics it looks to be an issue. Of late I've seen eating foods high in vitamin A such as liver, eggs, etc.
On the more conventional side, I thought this a nice article by Dr. Davis, on how he recommends reversing type 2 diabetes.
To reverse diabetes, follow the No Change Rule
http://www.wheatbellyblog.com/2015/10/to-reverse-diabetes-follow-the-no-change-rule/
And, Dr. Kendrick had a nice article on the Accord diabetes study, on how diabetes medications are not preventing complications from the condition. That's of course is a main goal a patient wants, but often over looked, to avoid diabetes complications.
http://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2015/08/04/turning-diabetes-upside-down/
excerpt:
"....How well does this work? Some of you will have heard of the ACCORD study, others will not. In this study researchers, tried to force blood sugar levels down as far as possible using intensive treatment. They found the following:
‘Until last week, researchers, doctors and every medical professional has believed for decades that if people with diabetes lowered their blood sugars to normal levels, they could not only prevent the complications from diabetes, but also reduce the risk of dying from heart disease. But the Accord Study, (for Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes), a major NIH study of more than 10,000 older and middle-aged people with type 2 diabetes has found that lowering blood sugar actually increased their risk of death.2’
There is one other way of lowering blood glucose, by using insulin ‘sensitising’ drugs. In diabetes most doctors look at metformin as the wonder drug. This drug improves ‘insulin sensitivity’ i.e. it helps to reduce insulin resistance. It is the absolute mainstay of type 2 diabetes treatment. Once again, however, it is targeted at purely the insulin/glucose model:
‘Metformin has been the mainstay of treatment for type 2 diabetes since 1998 when the UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed reduced mortality with metformin use compared with diet alone. Recently a French meta-analysis of 13 random controlled trials questioned the central role of metformin in the care of patients with diabetes. In this meta-analysis, in which 9560 patients were given metformin and 3550 were given conventional treatment or placebo, metformin did not significantly affect the primary outcomes of all cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality. The secondary outcomes—myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, leg amputation, and microvascular complications—were also unaffected by treatment with metformin.’3
Today we have a virtually unquestioned model of diabetes that is very simple, and easy to understand. It should be simple to understand as it works like this. If the blood sugar goes up, the body produces insulin to lower it. If the blood sugar goes down, the body produces less insulin and the sugar level goes up.
This has meant that, if you find someone had high blood sugar levels, you basically hit them with insulin. I call insulin the ‘glucose hammer’ and, as a wise man once said. ‘
If the only tool you have is a hammer, pretty soon everything starts to look like a nail’.
Reducing glucagon…. anybody?"