seabright1 said:
I The design?: If I have a hotdog sandwich with mustard, ketchup, and relish....Saratoga Springs is like a peunut butter mixed in that sandwich. My tastebuds may be sensitive to the taste of that peunit butter but some may like peanut butter with their hotdog sanwich. To each their own.
Some people like their hotdogs on a bun instead of a sandwich! And Elvis ate bananas with peanut butter!
It is true that SSR is different, and some people may feel like that means a lack of Disney magic. It seems obvious though that Disney was trying to create a different experience with SSR than the properties attached to hotels - a place more toned down/understated in its theme and presentation to appeal to different types of guests (or stages of life). I think it was a smart move - because while there is a percentage of people who use
DVC every year for themselves and continue to enjoy the parks/etc, I think there is a larger percentage that reach a stage in life where they'd like not do other things than theme parks. They've always had the option to go somewhere else with their points, but I think Disney was hoping SSR might encourage them to stay at a DVC resort a bit more. It is next to golfing, has an award-winning full spa (ranked higher than the one at GF in national media), has a spread out, resort town feel with lots of walking ways/jogging trails, it's the only DVC resort I can find that offers appointments with a personal trainer and it has a full, state-of-the-art fitness center. It's close to shopping, entertainment and more dining options than anywhere (other than EPCOT).
I have a feeling that there will be many families that will ONLY stay at SSR because they have a member that "does not like theme parks". With its DTD access, SSR is the one DVC resort where a couple could shop, eat, see some shows, golf, swim, take evening walks, go to the spa, use the fitness center and personal training, and feel like they had a nice, restful, resort vacation without ever going into one of the parks.