cabanafrau
DIS Legend
- Joined
- May 10, 2006
- Messages
- 15,708
Lord knows it's hard to verify the accuracy of anything on the internet about this case, but what I read said the report said "no prints were found on the flashlight" and that when "no prints" appears in a report, it means no usable information. The report did not specify that it was wiped clean and there is no reason to believe that is the case.
That's where questioning of a witness can prove valuable. If that kind of information isn't put forward in the direct examination, cross examination should flesh out those details.
ETA: If regular people on a discussion board are asking those questions about the evidence and the conclusions put forward, do we seriously believe it hasn't occurred to the production staff of these television shows? Curious they never seem to put forth any of these issues as even worthy of questioning.
Last edited: