redrosesix
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
- Messages
- 5,033
But on his non-custodial days, he isn't supposed to be doing those things. Unfortunately, that's how divorce works. If a kid needs to be picked up, taken to a game, taken to the dentist, it's the parent who has custody that day who is supposed to go.
I can't remember who said this- but I have to disagree. There are EIGHT children in this situation. Eight children close in age- it's very possible 2 are sick at the same time- very possible one parent is at the dentist with one and the school calls because someone has thrown up. If Jon were in close proximity- he could be there when his kids needed him and not just when it's his turn. School plays- assemblies- trips to the ER- chaperoning class trips- it goes on and on. By moving his second residence to NYC, Jon has made himself a part time parent, and his children will resent his "new life" in the future.
Let's hope not.
I think they were real for Kate. I think she was trying very hard. Just because they were having issues, doesn't mean the renewal was a sham. Maybe it was to Jon- but to her it was real.
I believe I read she got a place right in town. As a mother I know I could NEVER live as far away from my young children as Jon has chosen to do part time.
It was me who posted that comment first. As for being a part-time dad, that is what divorce means: each parent is a part-time single parent. But I would consider them part-time parents in any case -- they do have a nanny.
Kate may have an apartment closer to the home, but she would still be doing public speaking engagements and book tours if they didn't get cancelled. I just find it interesting that you bash Jon for getting an apartment 2.5 hours away, but aren't criticizing Kate for attending a conference in California.