She can if the judge allows it.
This is from the
azcourts.gov website:
In a criminal trial, the prosecuting attorney presents evidence and testimony of witnesses to try to prove the defendant committed the crime. The attorney for the defendant may present evidence and witnesses to show that the defendant did not commit the crime or to create a reasonable doubt as to the defendants guilt. The defendant is considered innocent of the crime charged until proven guilty.
When the prosecutions side has completed its questioning of a witness, the defense is allowed to cross-examine the witness on any relevant matter.
After cross-examination, the attorney who originally called the witness may ask additional questions of the witness to clarify something touched on in the cross-examination. This is redirect examination.
The judge may allow an opportunity for the opposing attorney to recross examine.
So far this judge hasn't allowed it from when I started watching it.