Jodi Arias Trial Part 4, starting with redirect of "expert" Dr Samuels, March 19


If not, maybe Mare still has that old hard hamburger in her fridge. :teeth:
Luckily, DH didn't eat it last night, so that was breakfast. :blush: It's amazing how sauteed mushrooms can help salvage a slab of ground beef.
About the Amanda Knox thing, very scary that you can overturn an acquittal! :eek:
It is scary. As frustrating as it is to not be able to go back after Casey Anthony, or OJ, or whomever, the point is to not keep coming back to someone over and over again, like they're doing to Amanda Knox in Italy.
Well she claims to have PTSD, so has to be high enough to confirm her self diagnosis.
Not necessarily. Add up all of our combined expertise from this trial on hippocampus amnesia and...umm...other things, and surely we have 35 years of experience, which can be combined with any score on any test to prove whatever she wants.
 
Yeah it is. So I hope you're not planning on committing any crimes in Italy.

I'm very conservative and about as law abiding as you're likely to find, but I read that someone posted that Knox said she would go back. There is NO WAY ON THIS GREEN EARTH that I would go back. Nope, would not happen.


It is scary, but I kind of wish the USA could do it once.... Casey Anthony ;)

:scratchin

;)
 
Didn't get to watch at all today, but it sounds like it was a good morning to miss?!?! Hopefully things will get more interesting after lunch...
 
Over turn the "double jeopardy" for CA and SIMPSON. Even though Simpson sits in jail now, I still wish he was found guilty at his trial. :mad:
 
This protective order pertains to Beth Karas, Shana Druckerman , and Paul Matadeen via email.
 
I'm very conservative and about as law abiding as you're likely to find, but I read that someone posted that Knox said she would go back. There is NO WAY ON THIS GREEN EARTH that I would go back. Nope, would not happen.

From what I've read and heard, she would not be required to go back. According to one of her attorney's (Theodore Simon) the Supreme Court is sending her case back for review and she's not required to attend.
 
This protective order pertains to Beth Karas, Shana Druckerman , and Paul Matadeen via email.

I read on WS that the protective order was to prevent disclosing how much the DT has spent on witnesses and research. They don't want people knowing what they are spending the TAXPAYERS money on. Does anybody know if this is true?
 
I read on WS that the protective order was to prevent disclosing how much the DT has spent on witnesses and research. They don't want people knowing what they are spending the TAXPAYERS money on. Does anybody know if this is true?

I saw this on the State vs Jodi facebook
 
I read on WS that the protective order was to prevent disclosing how much the DT has spent on witnesses and research. They don't want people knowing what they are spending the TAXPAYERS money on. Does anybody know if this is true?

Oooh that's interesting. I would love to know how much they've spent, considering the last two witnesses are making $200+ per hour. :scratchin
 
Beth Karas said that she saw the transcript of a hearing a few weeks ago and JM ripped into Violet, or at least that's how it appeared on paper.

Also, Beth said that the female juror with the multi-colored hair has been very attentive during this testimony and was nodding her head.

Have I mentioned that I really just want this to be over with?
 
I read on WS that the protective order was to prevent disclosing how much the DT has spent on witnesses and research. They don't want people knowing what they are spending the TAXPAYERS money on. Does anybody know if this is true?

If that is the case , Willie opened the door this morning having this lady state what she is being paid. That would defeat their own purpose.
 
Here we go. Let's hope this is more interesting than it was earlier.
 
Going thru pages on WS, someone said it came from a source in courtroom that JM needs 5 days for his rebuttal (this is what he apparently told the judge). So with questions and all that BS, I'm saying more like 10 days.
 
Going thru pages on WS, someone said it came from a source in courtroom that JM needs 5 days for his rebuttal (this is what he apparently told the judge). So with questions and all that BS, I'm saying more like 10 days.

Aaaaand with Nurmi's cross examination I'll raise your 10 days to 20. :lmao: ;)
 
WildAboutTrial‏@WildAboutTrial3h
Turns out Beth was asking for details on the cost of the defense for #JodiArias. The order is because defense doesn't want to release info.


WildAboutTrial‏@WildAboutTrial3h
There is a hearing tomorrow morning at 9 about the motion for protective order. #JodiArias


WildAboutTrial‏@WildAboutTrial3h
The hearing will not be in this courtroom, it will be down the hallway under a different judge, Joseph Welty. #JodiArias
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top