Jodi Arias Trial Part 3, STILL in redirect of Jodi, Mar 5

[usnuzuloose]

Just looked, thanks for the heads up, but I'm not seeing anything out of the ordinary. Sue Stodola has been the mitigation specialist since the beginning of the trial. Did it say something in particular?

Just noticed it at the top, no , it doesn't really say anything.

 

[Uncle Remus]

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/03/15/meet-jodi-arias-jury

Dang, you give new meaning to ask and ye shall receive.

Thanks, gonna read it now.

 

[usnuzuloose]

That is a good mix of JURORS!!!

And now for me knowing the questions they asked, I really like them all.

I kinda got a feeling that they are seeing it OUR way. ANYONE ELSE feel that way about the Jury????

It would seem to me , they have their minds already made up. They checked out so long ago. They probably feel tortured to sit and listen to all these experts phoney baloney......

 

[usnuzuloose]

I do. I hope.
With the questions they asked, I would THINK they are seeing it OUR way. I think most of the questions spoke to the inconsistencies Jodi had given.

Monday afternoon can't come soon enough!

Depending how long , what the heck is the lady attorneys name? How long she decides to keep this guy yacking.

 

[momrek06]

In the comments, somebody said the only one we *might* have to worry about is the one who swivels her chair toward Jodi. Not sure if that means she sides with her and wants to make sure she catches it all or if her ******** meter is going off and wants Jodie's to know she isn't fooling anybody. I would be the type to stare her down.

I heard BK one evening speak of the Jury and she said Juror #1 who sits directly across from JA always has this look of disgust on her face when JA is again telling some LAME lie. Or BK said she has seen Juror #1 'smirk' when JA lies … soooo I am thinking she is on our side. BK said it was a woman, this Juror #1.


Not sure who the Juror is that is swiveling her chair … hmm.

 

[2DisPrincesses]

I've been thinking about this "expert" saying yesterday that if the if the memory isn't there then it simply isn't there and that's why Jodi would not be able to remember anything even under hypnosis. However, she has claimed several times on the stand that "some things have come back to her over the years".

 

[momrek06]

Beth Karas InSession
Today's hearing with Dr. Samuels is postponed until 1:15 pm ET/10:15 am in Phoenix on Monday. One of the attorneys has a family emergency and couldn't be in court today.
Jurors will now return Monday at 2:00 pm ET/11:00 am in Phoenix.

 

[usnuzuloose]

Beth Karas InSession
Today's hearing with Dr. Samuels is postponed until 1:15 pm ET/10:15 am in Phoenix on Monday. One of the attorneys has a family emergency and couldn't be in court today.
Jurors will now return Monday at 2:00 pm ET/11:00 am in Phoenix.

So monday at 11. I hope who ever it is they are ok.

 

[Uncle Remus]

I can't imagine being one of these married jurors having to go home every day and act like nothing important happened in my day to my spouse.

And then there's the high probability some people are gonna hate the jurors who may keep the outcome from being a conviction of 1st degree.

 

[PebblesMK]

So monday at 11. I hope who ever it is they are ok.

11 plus an hour, right? I have arranged my life around court and they never start on time! (I really just wanted a foot stomping face but there isn't one)

 

[2Kds2K9]

I can't imagine being one of these married jurors having to go home every day and act like nothing important happened in my day to my spouse.

I would be BURSTING by the time I got home everyday. I'm one who likes to unload. I simply could not do it!

 

[justmestace]

I can't imagine being one of these married jurors having to go home every day and act like nothing important happened in my day to my spouse.

And then there's the high probability some people are gonna hate the jurors who may keep the outcome from being a conviction of 1st degree.

I would be BURSTING by the time I got home everyday. I'm one who likes to unload. I simply could not do it!

My husband has served on the Grand Jury in Phoenix, twice. That means 3 months of going downtown every day and listening to the sordid details of ALL KINDS of cases.
Yes, it's hard for him to come home and not talk about it. But I don't really want to hear it. It's the legalities and such that really intrigue me.
For example, some of the questions that they aren't allowed to ask when presented with a case....if they are told that the accused is a hispanic, they can't ask if that person is in the U.S. legally or not. (I'm not judging or starting a debate about immigration...that was just an example)
Or in a rape case, they obviously can't ask what the victim was wearing at the time.

It's interesting.....the whole system.

As for Jodi Arias......I have my mind made up. I was very closely involved in a murder case in my town (north of Phoenix) where the accused claimed he didn't remember, and he did terrible things to his female victim and then tried to cover it all up by burning the house down (attempting to) and then some....so I guess I'm a skeptic. I was inside that house, helping the owner clean it......

 

[crz4mm2]

I would be BURSTING by the time I got home everyday. I'm one who likes to unload. I simply could not do it!

Me either.

 

[usnuzuloose]

11 plus an hour, right? I have arranged my life around court and they never start on time! (I really just wanted a foot stomping face but there isn't one)

 

[Uncle Remus]

I would be BURSTING by the time I got home everyday. I'm one who likes to unload. I simply could not do it!

My husband has served on the Grand Jury in Phoenix, twice. That means 3 months of going downtown every day and listening to the sordid details of ALL KINDS of cases.
Yes, it's hard for him to come home and not talk about it. But I don't really want to hear it. It's the legalities and such that really intrigue me.
For example, some of the questions that they aren't allowed to ask when presented with a case....if they are told that the accused is a hispanic, they can't ask if that person is in the U.S. legally or not. (I'm not judging or starting a debate about immigration...that was just an example)
Or in a rape case, they obviously can't ask what the victim was wearing at the time.

It's interesting.....the whole system.

As for Jodi Arias......I have my mind made up. I was very closely involved in a murder case in my town (north of Phoenix) where the accused claimed he didn't remember, and he did terrible things to his female victim and then tried to cover it all up by burning the house down (attempting to) and then some....so I guess I'm a skeptic. I was inside that house, helping the owner clean it......

My wife and I have had numerous conversations about this case, she keeps harping how guilty she is (and I agree), but hell, this prosecutor hasn't done a very good job of proving it (I mean 1st degree premeditated murder) and it's maddening to me.


A few years ago I was in a jury pool with a retired Texas Highway patrolman who knew I was a former Federal LEO and the case was about police officers from two jurisdictions pulling over another law enforcement officer from yet another jurisdiction. The charge was DUI, but the retired officer and I had a hunch there was much more involved. Anyway, he and I whispered to each other how we definitely didn't want to be in on that jury! Just goes to show you some possible jurors have already disqualified themselves by discussing the case.

And about your personal involvement with cleaning up in a crime scene:

 

[usnuzuloose]

There is a county about 45 minutes from us where all there Grand Jury just quit. They did not give any real details why.

 

[crz4mm2]

My wife and I have had numerous conversations about this case, she keeps harping how guilty she is (and I agree), but hell, this prosecutor hasn't done a very good job of proving it (I mean 1st degree premeditated murder) and it's maddening to me.


A few years ago I was in a jury pool with a retired Texas Highway patrolman who knew I was a former Federal LEO and the case was about police officers from two jurisdictions pulling over another law enforcement officer from yet another jurisdiction. The charge was DUI, but the retired officer and I had a hunch there was much more involved. Anyway, he and I whispered to each other how we definitely didn't want to be in on that jury! Just goes to show you some possible jurors have already disqualified themselves by discussing the case.

And about your personal involvement with cleaning up in a crime scene:

UR, what do you think the Prosecutor could have done better? You don't think what he has done so far has helped at all?
Just curious. Course I have thought she was guilty all along.....

 

[usnuzuloose]

My wife and I have had numerous conversations about this case, she keeps harping how guilty she is (and I agree), but hell, this prosecutor hasn't done a very good job of proving it (I mean 1st degree premeditated murder) and it's maddening to me.


A few years ago I was in a jury pool with a retired Texas Highway patrolman who knew I was a former Federal LEO and the case was about police officers from two jurisdictions pulling over another law enforcement officer from yet another jurisdiction. The charge was DUI, but the retired officer and I had a hunch there was much more involved. Anyway, he and I whispered to each other how we definitely didn't want to be in on that jury! Just goes to show you some possible jurors have already disqualified themselves by discussing the case.

And about your personal involvement with cleaning up in a crime scene:

What evidence does not look to premeditation for you?

 

[momrek06]

I wish that JM had another prosecutor with him and that they could have each taken turns with JA. Plus I wish he was a bit more organized with his evidence instead of just a pile of paperwork on the desk in front of Det. Flores. Like I wish he had his OWN table to Flores' right with everything all lined up ready for when JM needs it.

Not knowing much at all about JM, he did seem to jump around allot. BUT I still like everything that he has brought to this case.

BUT there again if he has not convinced this Jury that this was MOST DEFINITELY premeditated then JA …. well I am not even going there.

 

[MaryAnnDVC]

Vinnie and JJ are laughing at the thought that JA has PTSD! OMG Is anyone else watching this?

Can't wait to see it when I get home. I was regretting setting every HLN show to record today after I saw that the Dr Whatsisname hearing was postponed till Monday, but gotta love Vinnie and JJ together and laughing!