freckles and boo
<font color=blue>I occasionally lurk on the UK boa
- Joined
- May 5, 2006
- Messages
- 6,382
Could not have said it any better myself. (Except I'm not liberal)
Common ground is nice, isn't it?
Could not have said it any better myself. (Except I'm not liberal)

There does seem to be some double standards to me. There's BET (Black Entertainment Network). If there was a WET (White Entertainment Network) all heck would break loose.
It's like getting it both ways. It appears people want inclusion but they want segregation too.![]()
We were just talking about this in my office this morning. There are the Essence awards, there are awards for Hispanic performers-but can you imagine if someone suggested the White Performers awards??
Whenever I see Sharpton or Jackson in the news, I'm always very suspicious of what they are actually aiming to accomplish. They are more concerned about themselves than advancing any civil rights issues. The Sean Bell case from last month (the groom who was shot 13 or so times in NYC) was really tragic, but I really doubt Sharpton cared on iota about that family. He was more concerned about getting his face on television, without adding an ounce of credibility to the case.
When they bought the distributorship in 1998, Yusef was 28 years old, and Jonathan 32. Neither had any experience in the beer business, or in running a company the size of River North. Yusef became a 67% owner, and Jonathan 23%. The remaining 10% went to a white Chicagoan named Donald Niestrom, Jr. who already had 10 years experience at the distributorship, and was vice-president of operations.
According to the Chicago Sun-Times, the Jacksons refused to say how much they paid for the distributorship, but public records show they received a $6.7 million loan from NationsBank to pay Anheuser-Busch for the distributorship’s assets, equipment, land and buildings. Anheuser-Busch, however, had spent $10.5 million seven years earlier to buy just the distributorship’s land and buildings.
This partnership between the Jackson and Busch families is a far cry from the early eighties when Jesse Jackson organized a boycott whose slogan was “This Bud is a Dud.”

Black Population of the US: About 13%
Black Membership of the Academy: 110 of 5,830 (about 1.9%)
In the rush to bash Jesse (and don't let me stand in your way, as I'm no fan of his either), it seems to me that he has a bit of a point. Unless, of course, you can back up the argument that a smaller percentage of actors, writers, and other behind-the-scenes people in Hollywood are black than in the general population.
I mean...Halle Barry was the first black woman to win the Best Actress Oscar...and it only happened about 5 years ago. I'm sorry, but that is an indication that there might be some bias there...unless you honestly think there were no female performances prior to then that deserved to win (unlikely).
So...bash away at Jesse and Reverand Al...I won't argue in their favor on much. But looked at as an argument rather than from that particular source, there seems to be some merit to the idea.
Can someone explain to me why Halle Berry is considered the first "black" woman to win a Best Actress Oscar when her mother is caucasion?
Black Population of the US: About 13%
Black Membership of the Academy: 110 of 5,830 (about 1.9%)
In the rush to bash Jesse (and don't let me stand in your way, as I'm no fan of his either), it seems to me that he has a bit of a point. Unless, of course, you can back up the argument that a smaller percentage of actors, writers, and other behind-the-scenes people in Hollywood are black than in the general population.
I mean...Halle Barry was the first black woman to win the Best Actress Oscar...and it only happened about 5 years ago. I'm sorry, but that is an indication that there might be some bias there...unless you honestly think there were no female performances prior to then that deserved to win (unlikely).
So...bash away at Jesse and Reverand Al...I won't argue in their favor on much. But looked at as an argument rather than from that particular source, there seems to be some merit to the idea.
There does seem to be some double standards to me. There's BET (Black Entertainment Network). If there was a WET (White Entertainment Network) all heck would break loose.
It's like getting it both ways. It appears people want inclusion but they want segregation too.![]()
Why does Jesse Jackson have soooooooooo much clout with the News agencies?![]()
Do they use him as a "entertaining laugh'?
Do they 'think' that people give a hoot as too what he says?
![]()
![]()
![]()
I honestly dont know anyone of any color who REALLY gives a frig what he has to say!
The news agencies might as well interview Joe Blow or Jane Doe!
If there were truly a need for a WET, I'm sure someone would have launched that network by now. In my view, it is not needed because the majority of characters in network or cable television (even when considering the black-targeted sit coms on the former WB) or in film are white characters.
If there were truly a need for a WET, I'm sure someone would have launched that network by now. In my view, it is not needed because the majority of characters in network or cable television (even when considering the black-targeted sit coms on the former WB) or in film are white characters.
But can you explain the need for BET? Sorry, but I just don't know the answer.