msjprincess
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
I've never heard of it before now.
I’ve never heard of this until now but I like it! 4 gifts is more than enough.
Some seem to be caught up on the "need". Maybe I buy differently but when I think of buying something the kids "need" it's something that it's a bit more than what I would usually buy. Like Dd a pair of Miss Me jeans or dgd needs boots so a pair of Uggs. Or Dd and Dil may get Urban Decay because they need eye shadow. Or like others have said, a lap top or major electronic. Someone almost always gets a new phone. I do get shampoos, tooth paste, etc for stocking stuffers but it's usually high quality items.
If I buy a Christmas present that is something to read it's a special book. For Dd, a entire series that she has been wanting. Or for DS a book he has been searching for that I found at a little out the way book store. Or for any of them a book by a local author.
The one that has "something to share", to me would be a game to play with family or friends.
I have a sweatshirt that says, "I'm not spoiled, my husband just loves me."Nope will not do it.. I reserve my right to spoil my kids and go crazy nuts in supporting our economy.
I feel like people who say they do this are promoting their self rightousness. I can spoil my kids with gifts and still not spoint THEM.
I want my tree to look like all those in the movies.. Boxes and boxes and boxes... I save all my boxes in wrap everything. The amount of money I spend has nothing to do with it.. I love wrapping each gift and spend time doing it.. I will by a pair of fun socks. ( last year DS got monorail ones I got in WDW in the summer). I packed them in a HUGE box weighted with old books....
Please don't equate gifting with love. Plenty of parents love their children but can't afford to shower them in presents. Conversely, my own parents were crap parents but, because they're narcissists, they piled an obscene number of gifts under the tree so everyone could see how rich and indulgent they were. Meanwhile, behind closed doors, they treated their child horribly.I have a sweatshirt that says, "I'm not spoiled, my husband just loves me."
I feel the same way about our son. He isn't spoiled, we just love him.
This is so funny, I counted down to see how quickly someone was going to comment on that.Please don't equate gifting with love. Plenty of parents love their children but can't afford to shower them in presents. Conversely, my own parents were crap parents but, because they're narcissists, they piled an obscene number of gifts under the tree so everyone could see how rich and indulgent they were. Meanwhile, behind closed doors, they treated their child horribly.
Oh. See, if I'm posting something that I think might be ambiguous, inflammatory, controversial or taken the wrong way, I make an effort to express myself as clearly as possible so no one misunderstands my point (sometimes easier said than done). I don't rile up message boards for "fun" so I didn't realize that's what you were doing. I thought perhaps you didn't stop to think how your comment could be hurtful to anyone reading along who already feels bad that they can't do more for their kids' Christmas, and I just wanted to help you understand that. My bad.This is so funny, I counted down to see how quickly someone was going to comment on that.
I almost put a caveat on my post but I figured that it would be much more fun to watch everyone jump.
Nope will not do it.. I reserve my right to spoil my kids and go crazy nuts in supporting our economy.
I feel like people who say they do this are promoting their self rightousness. I can spoil my kids with gifts and still not spoint THEM.
I want my tree to look like all those in the movies.. Boxes and boxes and boxes... I save all my boxes in wrap everything. The amount of money I spend has nothing to do with it.. I love wrapping each gift and spend time doing it.. I will by a pair of fun socks. ( last year DS got monorail ones I got in WDW in the summer). I packed them in a HUGE box weighted with old books....
Well, I spoil my kids and my grandkids too. When the kids were young enough for visits from Santa, it did mean 7 or 8 gifts each at least from Santa and another several from me and DH. Now, I spoil the grandkids but I am starting to learn that my money is better spent on experiences rather than a multitude of gifts. When kids get so much that they don't even remember what they have, its time to cut back and figure out another way to spoil them. Not self righteous at all, just lessons learned.
The problem is, everything seems to be taken wrong. Even something like this.Oh. See, if I'm posting something that I think might be ambiguous, inflammatory, controversial or taken the wrong way, I make an effort to express myself as clearly as possible so no one misunderstands my point (sometimes easier said than done). I don't rile up message boards for "fun" so I didn't realize that's what you were doing. I thought perhaps you didn't stop to think how your comment could be hurtful to anyone reading along who already feels bad that they can't do more for their kids' Christmas, and I just wanted to help you understand that. My bad.
You were equating spoiling with love and I was saying those two things have little to do with one another. There are many reasons a parent may not be able, or may not want, to spoil their child and it doesn't mean they love them any less. By the same token, a huge showing of gifts doesn't indicate love either. I just felt that was an important distinction to make. That's all.The problem is, everything seems to be taken wrong. Even something like this.
I never said that money means love. Or that giving gifts is love. I never said that people that can't afford numerous gifts didn't love their children. Instead you insinuated that.
You are equating spoiling with purchasing gifts. Or spending a lot of money.You were equating spoiling with love and I was saying those two things have little to do with one another. There are many reasons a parent may not be able, or may not want, to spoil their child and it doesn't mean they love them any less. By the same token, a huge showing of gifts doesn't indicate love either. I just felt that was an important distinction to make. That's all.
Fair enough. The PP with whom you agreed specifically mentioned spoiling with gifts, and the topic of this thread is about limiting gifts to a certain number, so I'm sure you can understand how I got the impression that's what you were talking about.You are equating spoiling with purchasing gifts. Or spending a lot of money.
The poster that I quoted said that it isn't the money. That she likes lots of boxes so that it looks like a tree on a TV show. She then spoke of spoiling.
I'm sorry that your parents equated love with purchased gifts, as you said. And I'm sorry that you have a problem with me saying that my husband effectively spoils me because he loves me. But spoiling doesn't have to mean purchased gifts. Sometimes it just means breakfast in bed. Or hot chocolate and fire when you are feeling down. At least it does to us.
A few of my local Facebook groups for moms have been talking about gifts.
The majority said that they follow the 4 gift rule. 1 gift that is a want , 1 that's a need, 1 something to wear and 1 something to read.
I have never heard of this before.
My kids would think that I forgot to go shopping.