Master Mason
<a href="http://www.wdwinfo.com/dis-sponsor/" targ
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
- Messages
- 8,512
Well I will not consider that a personal attack or I would have to report it to the moderators. HOw do you know I did not serve in the military? How do you know that a close relative of mine was not killed in the military in MUCH more acitve duty and without a videographer? How do you know I do not have first hand knowledge of that which I speak? Be careful when you sling arrows often then can richoet. How do you know that another close relative was not in shark infested waters for 24 hours with body parts all around him after his ship was blown up in another war and sufferd post traumatic stress most of his life. Since you do not know that PLEASE do not maligne my character and I will forgive you for your personal attack.
Well, I think that such a disability would have showed up over the 30 years he has been a senator, and those 30 years are what qualifies him to be POTUS, if Obama is qualified after 14 months as a Senator, surely 20x that amount makes McCain qualified.
I will agree that he was a bad president. He is the democratic George W. Bush (or is GWB a republican Jimmy Carter?).
But as far as former presidents go, I disagree wholeheartedly. He has not simply chosen to retire and go on a public speaking tour. The fact that he has devoted his post presidential life to human rights advocacy and promoting the spread of democracy tells me the moral fiber he is made of.
Jimmy Carter is a decent human being and a fine former president. Selling him short because of your obvious anti-liberal bias is a disservice to him and to the US presidency.
And to answer the title of this thread, yes he is. Just like Giuliani and Bush say 9/11 when they can't defend their positions. POW is the 9/11.
So being completely forgetful about several bills he voted on and, yes, how many houses he owns isn't the least bit troubling to you?
So being completely forgetful about several bills he voted on and, yes, how many houses he owns isn't the least bit troubling to you?
I have a question....if a presidential candidate was involved in a bad accident and somehow had some issues. What if they had slight brain damage and they spoke of it as being a "survivor" but it also clouded their cognitive abilities from time to time.
Would we not say that means they are not exactly able to make the best judgements in times of crisis?
What if the torture that McCain endured gave some issues with his mental abilities and judgement?
There are also a lot of other fine American soliders who received honorable medals and rank and were POW's, does that also make them qualified to be president?
How will being a POW affect his economic decisions? Affect his opinion of how well his Presidential campaign is going? Does the fact that he was in a POW camp really excuse his prickly demeanor enough to encourage him to be in negotiations with foreign states?
So being a POW prevented him from knowing how many houses he owns? There is no link between between being a POW and not knowing how many houses one owns. He should speak to his POW experience when it is relevent to the conversation at hand, otherwise it becomes a punch line. I don't think he wants that to happen and I think he'll be more careful with its use in the future (Or I think he SHOULD be more careful with its use).
He doesn't own any houses. His wife does. He signed a pre-nup when he married her and her money from her trust and businesses are hers, not his. Her investments are not his. Why shoulkd he keep track of his wife's holdings and investments when it's not his? "Cindy! Stop investing! Stop it I say!"
He's been in public service his whole life and he's never taken a dime from anyone. No one has overpaid for a lot so that he could get $400,000 in free equity in a home like Obama. McCain also hasn't commiserated and become friends with terrorists that bombed the Pentagon (Ayers)
I don't recall anyone ever asking how many houses Kerry and his billionaire wife owned. Probably he owned one or none and she owns a lot. So what. She inherited a fortune. Somebody earned it.
Obama wrote a best-selling book and used the proceeds to buy a mansion. (with a crooked felon). McCain wrote a best-selling book and donated the proceeds to charity.
McCain and his wife adopted a child from Mother Theresa's orphanage, but do you hear him talk about it for political gain? No. His son is enlisted and serving in Iraq. Ever hear him use it for political gain? No. His son is in the Naval Academy. Used it? No. So, to say he is using his own life experience for political gain is disengenuous. He has had a full life, full of choices and experiences as a decorated Naval Officer, as a combat pilot, as a POW, as a commander, as a student at the War College, as a Congressional Liaison, as a Congressman, as a Senator.
McCain has passed the test. Obama hasn't even taken it. As Joe Biden said, the White House doesn't lend itself to on-the-job training.
Well now that's easy, everytime he says "hope" or "change", we all take a drink.![]()
Because he did nothing to earn it again IMO.
I would rather it had gone to the Burmese monks, but . . .
Just curious, is it your take that he did not "...build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change"? Do you think man-made climate change is real?
The pre nup Sen McCain may have signed doesn't take him off the ethical hook for reporting all familial income and assets.
Jimmy Carter isn't good enough to clean McCains shoes.
McCain has passed the test. Obama hasn't even taken it.