Inspired by Pandy's Imagineering article -- which would you prefer...

Which way would you go if you were in charge of budget?

  • One huge really super-neat original attraction, even if it would mean waiting a few years for the ne

  • Several smaller non-headliner attractions, but it would allow more than one attraction in the next f


Results are only viewable after voting.

Rajah

DIS Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 1999
Messages
9,633
If you were in charge of budget at Disney and you had a certain amount to spend, which way would you rather spend it:

Do one HUGE all-out attraction, that would be the only one in a 5 year span...?

Or do 5 smaller slightly-neat attractions that are less expensive so you could get 5 out. But none would "blow the guests away"?

This would be like saying one Indiana Jones Adventure in Disneyland vs five Aladdin's Magic Carpets at Disneyworld.
 
No contest. The blow-out attraction wins hands down. I can wait. :)
 

Tough question. Probably one major, but it's according to the concept of the 5 minors.
 





New Posts










Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top