smartestnumber5
<font color=blue>Then it's just a fun time<br><fon
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2006
- Messages
- 2,933
Anyone seen the previews for this movie?
The plot is that a straight single dad (whose wife deceased) for some reason is having trouble listing his kids as life insurance beneficiaries. He finds some sort of "loop hole" but needs to have a domestic partner, so he gets his male friend to pretend to be his partner. (I still can't understand how having a domestic partner helps him about the kids being beneficiaries
). Anyway the rest of the movie seems to be about how funny it is for two straight men to pretend to be gay when the state sends someone to investigate whether their partnership is legitimate.
I'm pretty much prepared to hate this movie. I've already noticed in the previews that a ton of the jokes seem to come from the investigator trying to find out if the guys are attracted to women. (Umm, hello bisexuality. Having a male partner does not preclude one from being attracted to or having sex with women.
) More than that though, I feel like this movie will just embolden the anti-gay forces by making it look like domestic partnerships are "special rights" and it's not fair that straight people don't get them too.
A few weeks ago I was telling my cousin about some homophobia GF and I encountered while she was at the doctor (the doctor's office couldn't understand how she could be covered by my health insurance and went on and on about what our relationship to one another is). He didn't know that GF is on my health insurance and apparently didn't know much at all about domestic partner health benefits. As I was explaining he interrupted and said, "Well wait a minute, it doesn't seem fair that only gay people can get these benefits without being married. Why shouldn't same-sex and opposite-sex couples be able to get them?" I tried to explain that the rationale for same-sex partner benefits--if benefits are tied to marriage and gay people aren't allowed to get married they won't be able to provide health insurance for their families. (I agree that it would be great if similar partner benefits were available for unmarried straight couples more often; but I do think it's in a different league than such benefits for gay couples.)
He didn't seem to get what I was saying though. He just started going on about how gay people could be "committing fraud" by signing up as domestic partners when they aren't as serious about their relationship as they would be if they were married and pretty much implied that this is the situation with GF and I.
Ugh, like straight people never get married when they're not serious enough about the relationship? (Hmm, he's already been through one divorce and had it annulled through the Catholic Church by claiming he wasn't ready and he knew she wasn't the one and he just got pressured into the marriage
).
So there's my vent. Maybe the movie will surprise me. What are your thoughts about it?
The plot is that a straight single dad (whose wife deceased) for some reason is having trouble listing his kids as life insurance beneficiaries. He finds some sort of "loop hole" but needs to have a domestic partner, so he gets his male friend to pretend to be his partner. (I still can't understand how having a domestic partner helps him about the kids being beneficiaries

I'm pretty much prepared to hate this movie. I've already noticed in the previews that a ton of the jokes seem to come from the investigator trying to find out if the guys are attracted to women. (Umm, hello bisexuality. Having a male partner does not preclude one from being attracted to or having sex with women.

A few weeks ago I was telling my cousin about some homophobia GF and I encountered while she was at the doctor (the doctor's office couldn't understand how she could be covered by my health insurance and went on and on about what our relationship to one another is). He didn't know that GF is on my health insurance and apparently didn't know much at all about domestic partner health benefits. As I was explaining he interrupted and said, "Well wait a minute, it doesn't seem fair that only gay people can get these benefits without being married. Why shouldn't same-sex and opposite-sex couples be able to get them?" I tried to explain that the rationale for same-sex partner benefits--if benefits are tied to marriage and gay people aren't allowed to get married they won't be able to provide health insurance for their families. (I agree that it would be great if similar partner benefits were available for unmarried straight couples more often; but I do think it's in a different league than such benefits for gay couples.)
He didn't seem to get what I was saying though. He just started going on about how gay people could be "committing fraud" by signing up as domestic partners when they aren't as serious about their relationship as they would be if they were married and pretty much implied that this is the situation with GF and I.


So there's my vent. Maybe the movie will surprise me. What are your thoughts about it?