DwarfMaster
<font color=teal>Nothing creepier than your deceas
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2004
- Messages
- 1,034
I was 16

DawnCt1 said:Considering I am still 29, and DS#1 is 27; you do the math.![]()
(yes, that was sarcasm....kinda)jodifla said:OP asked about the finances about having kids. That's one of the big reasons we waited. I think that the statement, "If I waited until I could afford it to have kids, we'd never have them" is a huge falsehood.
Before we had DS, DH and I had our retirements funded and our DS's college education paid for. We can also afford to send him to private schools if that ends up being needed. We are well established in our careers, so taking time off from them is not a problem. Having a great track record at work buys you a lot of room once you have kids, because you've already paid your dues at work.
I think you are wise to wait until your are through school and started in your field. I'm actually pretty shocked to hear about all the teen mothers, or people who dropped out of college to start families. Having kids before you have your career established puts you in a dangerous position for the rest of your life -- if you're not careful.
jodifla said:OP asked about the finances about having kids. That's one of the big reasons we waited. I think that the statement, "If I waited until I could afford it to have kids, we'd never have them" is a huge falsehood.
Before we had DS, DH and I had our retirements funded and our DS's college education paid for. We can also afford to send him to private schools if that ends up being needed. We are well established in our careers, so taking time off from them is not a problem. Having a great track record at work buys you a lot of room once you have kids, because you've already paid your dues at work.
I think you are wise to wait until your are through school and started in your field. I'm actually pretty shocked to hear about all the teen mothers, or people who dropped out of college to start families. Having kids before you have your career established puts you in a dangerous position for the rest of your life -- if you're not careful.
justhat said:I think that's really wonderful, but unfortunately that won't really work out for a lot of people. Many people simply won't be able to afford all of those things in entirety, even if they save for a long time. Also for some people they don't plan to have a career, they want to be SAHMs for the next 20 or so years so that career building doesn't interest them. Additionally, many people feel that the risks associated with waiting till 40 to have a child are not worth the benefits so they sacrifice and have them younger. Also, I think no matter how much money you have, there will still be things that you can't afford for your kid, so I think that's why the phrase is so used.