How old is too old to be a mom?

dakcp2001

<font color=darkorchid>Am I wrong to want a cashie
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
5,386
I have always wanted children but I feel like the years have flown by! I am starting to wonder how old is too old to have a child? I am in my early thirties, but we arent planning to get married until 2012. I never really thought we were too old, but someone said something that has sort of been bugging me the last few days. For the record I do not think I am too old!

How old were you when you had children?
Any older moms? How has it been for you?
 
That is interesting.

In my area/circle, it is very common not to begin having children until mid-thirties.

I was 38 when DD was born, and it has worked out well for me.

Although, everything in life is a trade-off in some way. I have some health problems now that I didn't have when I was younger. That restricts my energy more than I would like, but not to the extent that I can't do things with DD. I can't do everything I would like, but I can still do plenty.

On the other hand, I am in a much better place now to be a parent. I am more patient and have a much better perspective on life.

Also, we are in a much better financial position now than we would have been in our twenties. We don't live in luxury, but it is very nice not to have to ever be worried about affording the basics for DD and to usually have enough funds left over for lots of fun things like Disney trips.

Don't worry about what other people say. Do what is right for you.
 
I am pregnant with my third child and will be 38 when he/she is born. Frankly I am not worried at all about handling a baby and young child at this age. What I do worry about is being there fully for this baby when he or she is grown up. And being there for any grandchildren. DH's parents had him when they were 34 and they seem sooooo old to us now and so elderly. Life is shorter than we think sometimes. The harsh reality is that many people over age 70 are not as vital and full of energy as they dreamed they would be . . .

Also, fertility and reproduction issues rise exponentially after age 35. The difference reproductively between a 30 and 35 year old woman is miniscule whereas it's statistically huge between a 35 and 40 year old woman. It's not pretty or convenient but it's true. Our eggs age no matter what kind of physical shape we are in otherwise.

Plus you don't know how long it will take to get PG. That is rarely predictable. Plus if you want more than one child then that would extend everything.

Basically you should figure out how important it is to you personally to have children. And if you determine that it is non-negotiable and a huge priority in your life then you should take action and make it a priority. The years will continue to fly by for you (as you've pointed out) and from what I understand they just go faster and faster.

Good luck with your decision!
 
I had something said to me too that just bugged me. It was a co-worker at a temp job, and he was from a very different culture, one of arranged marriages at young ages (I have a friend from the same culture, and her marriage was *sort of arranged* and has worked out quite well, they love each other very much, so I'm not totally against such things, I'm just telling the story). He was not that much older than me at the time, and had teens closing in on adulthood. He found out that I was 32 (maybe early 33?) and was only engaged, no kids, and he said "oh, well it's too late for you."

I wanted to say "you and your wife might feel old, but I don't, and it's not too late, go away!" but I just handed him his paperwork with a quizzical expression and ignored him.

And I got pg on our wedding night, pretty much.

For me, the main difference in having a baby at 34 vs what my friends experienced at younger ages was the REACTIONS each of us got, especially from supposed health care providers. Especially with pregnancy, they take a bell curve, call it "expectations", and then if you do not fit into that exact mold, you're abnormal. And age is just another one of the ways they do it to ya. Pretty much, if you're under or over 26.34, it seems, you shouldn't be having children. Too young, too old.

And the thing that so many don't understand is that many people aren't *choosing* to wait, it's just LIFE. I could have had 10 kids before I did, but they would have been with substance using losers and our lives would be full of stress and no money and it would have been so so so hard. I'm glad I didn't just go do that.

And now...we're waiting out the side-effects of a pituitary tumor in hubby, one that took his fertility down to as close to zero as you can get. A tumor that went undiagnosed for THREE YEARS (from symptoms, looking back), and do you know why? Because every time he complained to ANY sort of health care professional, and told them his concerns and how we weren't getting pregnant again (started trying when DS was 9 months old) and he really wanted his hormone levels checked...to a one, they said "your wife is 2.5 years older than you, and you're fat, that's why." They were age-ist about a woman who wasn't in the room, and wouldn't do the stupid bloodwork (which insurance TOTALLY paid for when we finally found someone who would order it), b/c again, their bell curve of fertility decided that it was ME because I was OLD. Malpractice, IMO. 3 years. Prolactinomas are not fun for anyone, and for a man the side-effects...just awful.

So we're waitin' that one out now.


All that to say...main differences I saw was in the reactions of the "professionals" I ran into!

And in my friend group, the ones who had kids "young" are all exhausted and looking to party party all the time. I'm feeling younger every week and looking younger, I get *carded* (at 41) when others around me aren't being carded, my energy is increasing... I like being an "older" mom, even if it's something that I never *chose*. I fully expect that when I get pregnant again, especially with the experience I had with DS (was a skosh bit overly whiny), it'll be even better. And maybe I'll just lie my butt off about age to any health care professionals I might run into. Would be interesting, to see how they reacted to different info! (sure I'd be paying OOP but still)
 

I was 37 with my first, and 40 with my second, and I definitely don't think I was too old. Assuming they follow my plan (ha!), they will both have graduated college and be living independent, happy lives by the time I retire, so it all seems good to me...

We were offered genetic screening because of my age, but other than that, I can't say I was treated any differently than any other mom. Probably helped, though, that my Dr. was a woman my age who had her first child a year after me, then her second a year before my second... :)
 
My son is 6 months old, I am 37. We were told my husband could not have children in 2002 so we had given up hope then last year we got the most wonderful surprise in the world. I was a little concerned about my age causing the baby health problems but he is completely fine and honestly I think we are better parents now than we would have been when we were younger. My pregnancy was very easy, I did have gestational diabetes but managed it with diet and he had no problems from it. I actually really enjoyed being pregnant. I feel like I have been given a new life as I get to experience things through his eyes. The only negative is that his cousins are much older than he is, our oldest nephew is 26 and youngest niece is 18. Luckily some of my younger cousins have little ones so he will get to play with them as he gets older. We would love to have another one in the near future if God is willing.

A friend had twins at 42, the babies are fine and she is fine.
 
I had my children in my 20s, but I'm a day care provider and have known MANY families who didn't start having children until their mid to late 30s. They seem happy and healthy to me.
Sure, the doctors may be a tad more cautious, might suggest testing they didn't offer to me. They are just covering all the possibilities that can occur during pregnancy and some of those possibilities relate directly to the mother's age. In my case, they offered lots of parenting tips and information they thought would be helpful to a "young, inexperienced" mother, but fewer health or age-related tests and tips. They are just doing their job and trying to make sure every pregnancy has a great outcome.
For the record, I do not think you are "too old," but I personally wouldn't dawdle about trying to conceive either, especially if you want more than one child. I think it just makes sense to at least try to avoid the over-40 pregnancy if you can.
 
I was a late in life child and it didn't work out well for me. Mom was 38 and dad was 42 when they had me. Daddy died when I was 13. I spent the rest of my time growing up having to take care of my mom due to her health. I had my kids in my 20's as I did not want to have kids after 30(so I had DD at almost 31). I understand things are different now. I'm just a little biased on the matter due to my upbringing. While I was raising my kids, I was also taking care of my elderly mother. She passed away from cancer when I was 38. My kids only had grandparents for a short time. (DH's parents are out of the picture for other reasons)

EDT: People always thought Mom was my grandma. Even when she was fighting for her life from cancer the nurses would refer to me as her "granddaughter" sometimes I wanted to scream "I'm her daughter!"
 
My personal cut off age for having kids is 40. I don't want to work forever so I feel that in order to provide financially the way that I have so far then if we don't have a 3rd by then then we're done.
 
We had our first at 32, second at 39. We never dreamed our second would take so long. I definitely wish we could have had her by 35.
 
I had my daughter at 30 and am by far considered the "young mom" in my circles. You're certainly not too old. As others have said, be aware fertility and health issues start to increase after 35 or so, but plenty of women have babies into their early 40's.
 
I'm 31 and pregnant with my first child. I definitely don't think someone in their mid to late 30s is too old to have children.

And the thing that so many don't understand is that many people aren't *choosing* to wait, it's just LIFE. I could have had 10 kids before I did, but they would have been with substance using losers and our lives would be full of stress and no money and it would have been so so so hard. I'm glad I didn't just go do that.

I totally agree with this. I didn't get married until just before my 30th birthday, so while I could have had kids in my 20s, it wouldn't have been a good decision. My college boyfriend turned into a loser (dropped out of grad school with only one test to complete, working part-time at the mall, and living with his parents), so if we would have had children it would have been a disaster!

Just don't watch the news too much -- I swear, at least once a week, they run a fear-mongering story about "late-in-life" pregnancy (meaning people over 30) or the terrible things that can happen to a baby while in utero.

If you and your husband-to-be want to have children, go for it!
 
Anyone remember that women in New Jersey who had a baby at 60 some thing? twins!!

that would be a bit too old IMO. I couldn't even imagine going through labor.
 
I had my oldest daughter at 20 and now at 41 my youngest is 14. A couple years ago DH and I had a serious ( but very brief :lmao: ) discussion of "just one more" and we squashed it. I feel like I've had kids all my life, I'm ready for some quiet.

I think when to have children is a personal decision, and everyone has a different situation. I had a child at 20 and a second at 21 but was married to a very successful business man, so I didn't have the typical " young people" financial problems. I have good friends my age who have careers and toddlers.

My only *definite* too old is these 50 and 60 year old women who are being made pregnant through science. I'm sorry but being 80 at your child's high school graduation is inappropriate and selfish.

Beyond that, it's whatever works for you.
 
Health of the parents is a huge factor. If there isn't a strong probability that both parents will be healthy and available to their children through their early 20s, they should reconsider.

Health of the potential children is another factor. Past age 35, eggs become less and less "viable", and genetic disorders become more prevalent. Taking care of disabled children is a trial for any parent, but it can be a real problem for older parents.

Finally, I would consider your "retirement" plans. Plan to support your children in some way until they are in their mid-twenties. That generally isn't possible in retirement.

We had our last when my wife was 34. We waited, but we stopped at two to avoid some of these things, and because the pregnancies were so hard on my wife (not due to age, but to her type 1 diabetes).

Good luck. :goodvibes
 
I was a late in life child and it didn't work out well for me. Mom was 38 and dad was 42 when they had me. Daddy died when I was 13. I spent the rest of my time growing up having to take care of my mom due to her health. I had my kids in my 20's as I did not want to have kids after 30(so I had DD at almost 31). I understand things are different now. I'm just a little biased on the matter due to my upbringing. While I was raising my kids, I was also taking care of my elderly mother. She passed away from cancer when I was 38. My kids only had grandparents for a short time. (DH's parents are out of the picture for other reasons)

EDT: People always thought Mom was my grandma. Even when she was fighting for her life from cancer the nurses would refer to me as her "granddaughter" sometimes I wanted to scream "I'm her daughter!"

My grandmother was 40 when she had my mom, and lived until the age of 95, and met all of her great grandchildren. My FIL was 40 when DH was born - he's now 83, and on no medication (DH's mom passed when he was 12 - an early agressive cancer).
 
I had my first at 24; and my second at 39.

My oldest got us when we had a little more energy, and our youngest got us when we had a little more money. It was easier with a little more money LOL
 
My grandmother was 40 when she had my mom, and lived until the age of 95, and met all of her great grandchildren. My FIL was 40 when DH was born - he's now 83, and on no medication (DH's mom passed when he was 12 - an early agressive cancer).

I think that one has to consider genetic history. Clearly 40 for one person might not be the same as 40 for another.
 
Don't let them bother you..

I think each persons version of to old is different.

For me personally I am 36 and feel I am to old and done. I do have 4 kids from 18 to 5. I am ready for grand kids in a few more years.. no more of my own.

I went thru the stage with my oldest son where I was always the "young mom" now with my 5yo when I go to his school I am the "older mom"

My mother did have my youngest sister at 39. It worked out fine.

Congratulations on your wedding!!
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom