NotUrsula
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2002
- Messages
- 20,033
The Washington Post has an article today about schools that are migrating to electronic textbooks, including mention of some mandates that California is adopting: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/18/AR2009101802360.html?hpid=topnews
The article really doesn't talk about the use pattern that I think is going to become most common in the near future: schools that only buy one set of physical books to store in the classroom, expecting the kids to use the electronic version for homework. So, instead of 80 copies of that social studies textbook for 4 sections of 20 students each, the school buys just 33 or so, including a few extras for the kids who can't access the web.
We already use this pattern where we can because DS has executive function problems that make it a real challenge for him to manage to always bring home the correct textbooks to match up to his homework.
For us, having the electronic version available works very well, and the textbook companies are OK with it because they still sell books to the school, so they license the electronic version at no extra charge. (Right now the number of simultaneous users needed is still fairly low because the kids do each have an issued hardcopy book.)
So, what do you think? Is all-electronic the way to go, or is a mix better? If you go all-electronic, is it classist and discriminatory toward families who don't have home internet accesss, or is it just the reality of our time?
One thing I will say: I think that the prediction that going all-electronic will turn out to be much cheaper than paper in the long run will almost surely turn out to be wrong. I deal with electronic resource negotiation at work, and IME, prices for maintaining access to electronic ALWAYS go up much faster than comparable rates for hardcopy. Electronic resources are really not something that you own, they are something that you lease, and publishers very quickly determine that managing that state of affairs and gatekeeping access gets very labor-intensive very quickly.
The article really doesn't talk about the use pattern that I think is going to become most common in the near future: schools that only buy one set of physical books to store in the classroom, expecting the kids to use the electronic version for homework. So, instead of 80 copies of that social studies textbook for 4 sections of 20 students each, the school buys just 33 or so, including a few extras for the kids who can't access the web.
We already use this pattern where we can because DS has executive function problems that make it a real challenge for him to manage to always bring home the correct textbooks to match up to his homework.
For us, having the electronic version available works very well, and the textbook companies are OK with it because they still sell books to the school, so they license the electronic version at no extra charge. (Right now the number of simultaneous users needed is still fairly low because the kids do each have an issued hardcopy book.)
So, what do you think? Is all-electronic the way to go, or is a mix better? If you go all-electronic, is it classist and discriminatory toward families who don't have home internet accesss, or is it just the reality of our time?
One thing I will say: I think that the prediction that going all-electronic will turn out to be much cheaper than paper in the long run will almost surely turn out to be wrong. I deal with electronic resource negotiation at work, and IME, prices for maintaining access to electronic ALWAYS go up much faster than comparable rates for hardcopy. Electronic resources are really not something that you own, they are something that you lease, and publishers very quickly determine that managing that state of affairs and gatekeeping access gets very labor-intensive very quickly.