Marionnette
Children see magic because they look for it
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,509
I guess that what I'm trying to say is that she would totally agree to everything that they would budget and she turned around and spent as she pleased whenever the urge hit her. Each time, she would promise to get her act together and try harder. You know the old adage about leading a horse to water...It doesn't sound like she really chose #1: Participate in a budget, help set goals, and spend in accordance with the budget
She controlled the budget, she set the goals, and she spent in accordance with HER budget (which didn't include utilities) - he didn't get to participate or set goals.
In a marriage, at least one person should take door #1, but if both people do, then it has to be a cooperative exercise in goal setting with an equal commitment to the goals and compromise. And if one partner chooses door #2, there has to be trust that the partner who chooses door #1 is going to be looking out for joint interests. I can't decide that my goal with our surplus every month is to develop the world's best designer purse collection, but everything he wants to treat himself to needs to come out of his $200 a month allowance. That is just driving to door #3.
My brother finally took over the household finances with his paycheck and she had her own paycheck (which was pretty small) to use however she saw fit. But even with that kind of freedom to spend whatever she made, she still wasn't happy and accused him of being controlling when all he was trying to do was to pay off the huge CC debts that she had amassed.
Obviously, there is more to the story than that. Some of the money problems led to other problems within the marriage. And some of their other problems contributed to their money woes.