The Teamsters are pointing at the BCTGM for failing to negotiate in good faith for the benefit of their members and the continued livelihood of the other Hostess employees:
http://www.teamster.org/content/teamsters-bakery-workers-should-hold-secret-ballot-vote-hostess
Failing to give an accurate, realistic financial picture of the company and the right to vote via secret ballot was a disservice to the members that pay the salary of the BCTGM.
http://www.teamster.org/content/teamsters-bakery-workers-should-hold-secret-ballot-vote-hostess
Teamster Hostess members were allowed to decide their fate by voting on the final offer conducted by a secret mail ballot. More than two-thirds of Hostess Teamsters members voted with 53 percent voting to approve the final offer.
The BCTGM chose a different path, as is their prerogative, to not substantively look for a solution or engage in the process. BCTGM members were told there were better solutions than the final offer, although Judge Drain stated in his decision in bankruptcy court that no such solutions exist. Without complete information, BCTGM members voted by voice votes in union halls. The BCTGM reported that over 90 percent rejected the final offer and three of its units ratified the final offer.
Failing to give an accurate, realistic financial picture of the company and the right to vote via secret ballot was a disservice to the members that pay the salary of the BCTGM.