horseshowmom
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2000
- Messages
- 10,287
This is not an attack on home schooling, but for you that home school, are you highly educated? I find it kind of disturbing to think about home schooling your children if you yourself are not that highly educated. I do understand if you live in a bad school district tho. I did know someone who was actually on this board a couple years ago that home schooled her children, and she herself had atrocious spelling. I'm sure it does work at times, maybe if your children live in a bad school district, etc. I remember LOVING school. Just trying to understand it, that's all.
It happens that both my husband and I have Master's degrees. I do NOT necessarily consider that as being that important. In our case, I used A Beka's curriculum and found it to very amply meet what was needed. We just used their curriculum through 8th grade, and then enrolled in the video school for high school. If there's anything you don't understand, rewind the teacher as many times as you wish (they never get tired of repeating themselves
). I might also add that parents of public school students might be surprised to find how often classroom teachers are not what is considered to be "highly qualified". Often teachers teach on "emergency licenses" that allow them to teach while they work on becoming highly qualified. I have taught high school math several times over my career and did now have certification in that. Fortunately, I was capable of teaching the Algebra courses I taught. That's not always the case though.
I might add, that my child LOVED homeschooling. She has indicated that if she ever has children she will homeschool. Her husband who is a public school teacher agrees. (BTW, both my husband and myself were public schooled and work in public schools now. This is a personal choice not a slam on the public school system.)
I homeschool. I was a high school teacher and counselor before I had children. I keep up my credentials as I do plan to go back at some point.
3. We have the time to do things we want to do when we want to do them. Our schedule is not dictated.
4. We can teach things that I still find important, like phonics and Latin.
5. Our values are not necessarily the same values the general public adheres to.
Where we live, there are so many activities, both academically based as well as socially based, that I never worry about them not getting out or getting what they need.
Dawn
Just to add a little here: I very much agree with #3. DD horseshowed fairly seriously, and she was able to attend out of town/state shows and visit her trainer as needed while we worked school around a flexible schedule.
#4 - I agree very much with this as well. Unfortunately, schools are often so focused on mandatory state testing that many important things (IMHO) are overlooked. I gave her a much more well-rounded education than the students I see in public school getting (although I never made it up to Latin, Dawn!).
#5. Again, I agree. A Beka included Bible in each year's curriculum, and that was important to our family. DD has a strong foundation in not only what she believes but why. (I will add that we had some minor differences of opinion with A Beka - primarily the KJV issue, but overall we were well satisfied.)
What happens when they go to look at colleges? Do the colleges just look at their SAT scores and other activities they were in, since of course there is no ranking. Can they do AP courses as a home schooled student?
Thanks for all the info!
We were very pleasantly surprised when we began investigating this. One of the reasons that we enrolled DD in A Beka's video program was to make sure she had a transcript since we knew she would be going into a professional field (thought it would be vet school but she changed her mind and went into pharmacy instead). Most colleges now have a section in their handbooks dealing with homeschool graduates. Our experience was that they were welcomed.
DD applied for the very competitive Early Entry Pharmacy Honors program during her senior year of high school and was accepted. When we went to visit the campus in December of that senior year, we found them to be very open to homeschoolers (this was a major state university).
DD did not take any AP courses although that is an option. I will add that her sophomore year she received a scholarhsip to tutor other students. Some of them actually turned out to have taken AP courses in the subject matter so while AP courses are a good thing, they aren't always as good as they should be.
I don't doubt the kids can get a quality education at home, however my years in school involved interacting with many different people both older and younger, teachers who shared their life experience and simply dealing with things like conflict resolution, following directions, time management and so many life lessons that have helped me in my adult life. Many of my lifelong friends were cultivated through my school years. Traveling to sporting events, pep rallies, proms ect, were some of the most memorable times of my life. I would hate to deny my kids those great times. I think sheltering kids from the outside world will hurt them in the long run, think what the Dugger kids will go through when they have to get a real job and mom and dad are not there to tell them what to think and do, just my thoughts, I respect any parent that has that kind of dedication to their kids, I couldn't do it
While I know that you believe what you are saying, you couldn't be further from the truth. I have never understood why people think that homeschooling is "sheltering your children". Almost none of the homeschool children are like the Duggars.
My daughter spent a great deal of time traveling to sporting events. In her case, she competed in Horse Bowl, Horse Judging, Hippology, and others through 4-H. These are all team events. She made 3 trips to the National Horse Classic Championships in Denver, CO (two as a competitor, one as the only teenage coach who had ever been sent). Our state university sent them out on the athletic bus with other state winners, and they had a ball. Her Horse Bowl team (she was Captain) was the National Chapions, and I think the Hippology team was 5th. They also competed at AQHA Congress as well as many, many district, state, and regional competitions.
In addition to that, she competed with her horse. At horse shows she had great fun with other friends - competing against each other in classes, flirting and carrying on at the dances that were generally held, and just hanging around in general.
Prior to becoming deeply involved in horses, she played softball at the league level and on the All Star (traveling) team.
That doesn't even begin to include church activities and field trips with friends. She also took piano for awhile until she decided that wasn't her thing.
Others have addressed your other points already. So I'll only add my 2 cents to the bit I bolded.
Homeschoolers typically interact with a much wider variety of people than public schooled kids. Your typical public schooled kid goes to the same class every day and spends most of their time interacting with same-age peers and teachers. A homeschooler interacts with the broader community (including infants, the elderly and disabled people), and attends activities and classes with children both several years older and younger. One comment I hear a lot is that homeschooled kids actually know how to talk confidently to adults, while public schooled kids tend to mumble and look away. I'm sure that isn't true for every kid, but it seems to be an overall trend. And it would make sense... the homeschooled child meets and interacts with strange adults every day they're out in the world. The public school kid only interacts with people they already know well.
Homeschooling - to my mind - is the opposite of sheltering your child. Unless of course you're living in a religious compound in the middle of the desert. But the folks don't represent the homeschoolers I know (and once was).
Absolutely! I can't tell you how many times I had people comment on well spoken and confident my daughter was. It served her well because her dad and I didn't come from horse people. Many, many adults in the horse community took her under their wing and helped her advance her career largely due to how well she communicated with them. When she applied for the Early Entry Pharmacy Honors program, she had to go through an interview process. The interviewers commented on how well she interviewed. She competed in Judging that required her to orally defend her reasons. She was top score many times even when her placings didn't match the judge's, because she was confident, logical, and could verbalize her selections. Sheltered - nope, well rounded - definitely!
I don’t agree with Tim Tebow.
I think it is unfair for a homeschooled child to play for their local high school team. The child that is home schooled has an advantage. They don’t have to worry about the big paper due on the same day as the big game. They have more time to practice. They can sleep in the day of a big game, instead of sitting at a desk at 7:30am. Their parents can adjust the course workload during the “sports season”. Etc. Not to mention the recruiting nightmare that would ensue if children that didn’t go to a certain high school were allowed to play sports for that school.
IMO, If you want to play on a high school team, you should attend that school.
Otherwise, I think homeschooling (done under the correct circumstances) is a wonderful thing!
Don't agree at all. While my daughter chose not to participate in school based sports, I pay taxes just like everybody else. If she had wanted to do so, she should have been able to do so. While I doubt very seriously that our local school is even aware of it, our state does require schools to allow homeschoolers to participate in sports if they wish.
It's usually mentioned around election time and more locally than state-wide, but we had a candidate who was all for making home schoolers more accountable to the state, more testing and if they 'failed' then they would have to be enrolled in school. Luckily he didn't make it far.
From time to time, I hear people voice this. When schools start holding back all of the students in their own classrooms who don't perform satisfactorily on the standardized test, then I will be more willing to discuss options, but I don't see that happening.
(I say this knowing full well that my own daughter would have done fine. She had a 32 on the ACT and wound up with the highest academic honor her university conferred when she finished her bachelor's degree. She will graduate from pharmacy school in May as an Honor's graduate.)
I loved homeschooling, and it served my daughter well. I didn't have a hard time deciding to do it. Nobody had to talk me into it. To each their own though!