According to 2015 Florida Statutes regarding timeshare purchases under Section. 721.075 Incidental benefits.
Contrary to what some posters are claiming, Disney has not terminated any incidental benefits and thus the supposed disclosure clause in the resale agreement about Disney's right to do so at any time means nothing. All of the incidental benefits continue to be provided by Disney. The only thing Disney has done is to create a special class of purchasers who will not get them. Under current timeshare law, Disney no longer has an absolute right to terminate at any time incidental benefits for all members. Disney is now required to state the specific minimum length of time, which can be any time that is 3 years or less, that incidental benefits will be provided to members who purchase from it, and during that specified time, it cannot terminate any particular incidental benefits for such members unless it replaces them with benefits of like kind and value, or, alternatively, pays the affected members double the value of the incidental benefit being terminated. Thus, that resale contract disclosure about Disney's right to terminate likely cannot be relied upon by the seller or broker to claim rights to your deposit.
Moreover, the action Disney has taken specifically applies to you and it affects your ability to have access to incidental benefits that Disney is otherwise providing. The issue for your right to rescind is not whether Disney can preclude you from using incidental benefits, which it likely can, but instead whether that information about resale purchasers being precluded, which is now provided in an official document called Membership Extras, which itself is now one of the disclosure documents applicable to the timeshare, is something material to your decision to purchase and complete the resale. More has to be done to look into the issue, but my personal sense is that you have a much stronger case to be able to rescind and get back your deposit than others above have asserted, possibly through a legal doctrine that allows a party to rescind when there has been mutual mistake, i.e., both seller and buyer were acting under the incorrect belief that the buyer would have access to the incidental benefits that Disney was providing and continues to provide.
Perks are not contractual but if it were a material consideration to the negotiations, then as a matter of law, the contract may be rescinded. The legal issue is RELIANCE and whether that reliance was and is material.
I need a lawyer that is licensed in Florida that would be willing to take on Disney and set a precedence.