DISUNC
<font color=peach>I cried like a baby watching the
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2004
- Messages
- 23,807
No, THAT IS THE TRUTH. It was called Amendment One and had to do with the portability of Save Our Homes.
http://www.nbc15online.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=5df5f26c-cc9c-4c8a-b778-f921633eaf2c
I know that Floridians went to the polls that day to vote for the homestead act. BUT not everybody in Florida is a homeowner either.
So when Obama supporters says Hillary only won because of this is ludachris.
No matter what the reason was ...SHE STILL HAD MORE VOTES. Whether anybody wants to count them, or half count them. MORE people went to the voting booth and clicked on her name. We dont count reasons behind the votes in this country. We just count the votes.
That was a compromise reached by the MI Democratic party and in no way shape or form made any difference to the fact the Hillary LOST. Did you get that: Hillary LOST.]
Duh I know Hillary lost.
But who the heck is the MI Democratic party to tell a MI Democratic voter that the vote they cast for Hillary or Edwards or Richardson will now go to Obama?
The part where they DID THIS. WHY???? Why would the DNC steal votes from her and others 7 give them to Obama, Knowing it would not make a difference?If Obama had never been given those votes, Hillary would've LOST. Those votes made no difference. What part of that can't you understand?
They did it to PO everybody and say, "we dont care what anybody says, we are gonna shove Obama down your throats wheter you like it or not!"
And that is what they did!

As a matter of fact, I didn't click on Obama's name. I clicked on Kucinich's name. I personally know of 3 people who went in to vote solely for Amendment One and didn't bother making a primary selection because they knew it wouldn't count.
But, honestly, what is your point? The Florida Democratic party was told their delegates would not be seated if the primary was held early. Hillary's advisor, Harold Ickes, voted for not seating the Florida delegation. Hillary was fine and dandy with it until she realized she needed the votes.
You may be entitled to your opinion, but you are NOT entitled to your own facts.
This entire discussion is moot. It is over. Hillary LOST. No matter what gyrations you go through, that will not change.
But if it wasnt going to count why did you vote for Kucinich?




Ok I will offer you 5 million dollars from LuvDukes bank account, and a peice of real estate from the Moon!I apologize that I do not know how to use the partial quote feature of DIS, which left out my posts that you had quoted.
You read my post wrong. I did not say Hillary should give delegates to Obama -- you are right that she did not have that power. I said "offer." That is different. It would have been an olive branch, even if it had no teeth behind it. And then the party could have fought over the specifics. I think (opinion, not fact) that such a position by Hillary would have lowered the temperature of the MI debate a bit..
Isnt that NICE of me!

I say keep your 'olive branch"
And then your "just to naive Obama supporters" comment is inaccurate. I was not an OS until late Tuesday night. Technically, I am just a "Presumptive Nominee Supporter." But I still thought at the time (opinion, not fact) that the party was asking for trouble if they would take a big state like MI and assign zero delegates to a top candidate like Obama. Especially when the candidates had agreed ahead of time that MI would be penalized.
The candidates DID not agree ahead of time to penalize anyone.
The DNC did, and they told the candidates that if they dont sign onto this they cannot run for President.