I think it's a confused reference to inflation. He's thinking that the value of a dollar will decrease, while the cost of goods increases . . . so $1000 today seems like a great deal of money, while in the future it'll buy less . . . kind of like how my mom might've bought a week's worth of groceries for $25 back in the 70s, but now I pay $100 for the same amount of food . . . he's thinking that $3500 today is a great deal of money, while in the future it'll be a moderate amount.I'm not sure how "we won't have as much purchasing power in a few year so we should move now" and "we will grow into the mortgage" are compatible ideas. Seems to me that either one of these would/should cancel out the other, you know?
My 5/1 ARM is based off the 1 year treasury as reported by the Federal Reserve Board as of a certain date with a 45 day look back. It is 275 basis points over the said rate. The servicer does not have the ability to arbitrarily raise the reset rate if, in fact, interest rates have gone down. In fact, in the US, all ARMS are based off of some formula, which is clearly stated in the contract. I have no idea what you are talking about unless you are referencing Australian or UK mortgages.
Actually, not all ARM's are US treasury based. One significant example would be the COFI, another would be the LIBOR. The COFI (Cost of Funds Index based on the 11th District) is about the only ARM that I've ever seen lower rates, however, that loan is funky. The monthly payment stays the same no matter what, and it can result in negative amortization.
The LIBOR is based on the London Interbank Offering Rate, and you still find them in some portfolio products.
Anne
)I think it's a confused reference to inflation. He's thinking that the value of a dollar will decrease, while the cost of goods increases . . . so $1000 today seems like a great deal of money, while in the future it'll buy less . . . kind of like how my mom might've bought a week's worth of groceries for $25 back in the 70s, but now I pay $100 for the same amount of food . . . he's thinking that $3500 today is a great deal of money, while in the future it'll be a moderate amount.
But I think he's wrong. Even if he is right, it isn't going to happen tomorrow -- what are they to do until inflation magically lowers their house payment? No, too risky for me.
That also seems like a low payment for that price.
As a general rule of thumb, your mortgage should be no more than 25% of your income.
I think there's a "happy medium" that, for the great majority of us, is "just right". It's hard to live in too small a house -- nowhere to store things, no privacy, no space to spread out a project. On the other hand, too large a house is also a burden, but in a different way -- paying to heat/cool space that isn't being used, large lawns that need maintaining, cleaning and paying taxes. As with most things in life, a balance is necessary.The other good point raised here is the cost of the utilities and maintenance of a very large house. We do have 3 kids and we would like the space, but there is a point at which things seemed to get out of control for us. We have friends who are building a 6500 sf house with 14 foot ceilings. Once the house is built they won't have any money for furniture (they are currently in a 1600 sf house) so she is planning on buying furniture during a 'no interest, no payments for 12 months sale' I don't think they have truly realized how much this house will cost to heat, paint, landscape, furnish etc. It is going to be interesting watching what happens to them in the next 5 years...
is it tight money wise, well, sure sometimes but when I think of what we have gained? worth it every time. sometimes we all make sacrifices temporarily to get ahead down the road. (ie. schooling to bring in better income) We live in California and are blessed to have a beautiful 3200 sq ft house in a good but not great neighborhood. We are actually considering downsizing slightly in order to hand pick our neighborhood and schools.
Around me the going rate for a 2500 sq ft house is about $500-600,000. believe me the pain is real. The real killer is taxes. Our taxes are what a lot of people pay in Principle and Interest.
There is no doubt $3500 is hard to swallow for most working folks. My only comment is their is a difference between extension and strangulation.

DH is a mortgage bond analyst (so I get these lectures ALL the time)
You have my sympathy!Not to mention, when one has a bigger house, one needs more stuff to put in it and around it (i.e., landscaping), it takes more to heat/cool and clean. When you start talking about these Plywood Palaces, the mortgage is just a part of the monthly cost.
) and my electric/gas bill for the home I'm in now--which is double the size--is about $20 more per month. Because some of my other utilities are lower in this area than they were where we used to live, it actually works out to costing less for utilities here.Right now my DH makes just over six figures so it would be tight but this house in theory should be the one we stay in. Housing prices in this area are high yes there are some parts of Catonsville that you can buy the same type of house for half the price but they are not in good areas.
We went from a 2000 squ. ft. house to 5500 squ. ft. We were shocked at how underestimated the costs were. Fortunately we could afford it but we were shocked none the less. We sold the house b/c we realized how much we were wasting in utility costs and taxes (10% increase in a year ends up being a lot more money on the bigger house). We had winter months when our heat bill (propane) cost over $900! We are not even home for 10 hours a day and we kept it on 62 at night. We now realize how wasteful the two story foyer and 10' ceilings were.
We heat our 4000 sq foot home with propane. We live in PA. Our entire bill last year for heat and hot water was $1100. We still have propane left. We heat to 70 degrees. We have 10' ceilings on our first floor and 12 feet in the family room.