Oh, I agree with that; after all, an awful lot of adults today are not really financially saavy. How could their children appreciate the value of being debt-free when their parents have taught them (by example) that you can have what you want today by charging it?I dare say there a quite a number of kids making the decision where to go to college without considering the overall cost.
But in a situation like the OP's, where one school makes sense financially and the parent knows it, the parent should be able to show it to the student on paper . . . and the student should be able to understand -- when shown -- that one choice can lead to graduating debt-free and starting her professional life with a clean slate (which is hard enough!), while the other will be harder financially.
This makes perfect sense to me. We're telling our kids exactly what we can afford to pay, and we're emphasizing the choices that'll lead them to graduating debt-free.I agree with you, eliza...but this is where parents really need to step up their game and TEACH their kids about the realities of money and budgeting.
Too often we shelter our kids from our own budget situations. This is not the time to be secretive.
We made it explicitly clear to our daughter that when it came to college, there were some hard and fast rules regarding the money aspect:
1) The school she chose to attend would require that she graduate with the maximum amount of Stafford Loan debt available for an undergraduate degree: $27,000. There is always a chance that we will be able to help her pay it off, but absolutely no guarantees. She WOULD have skin in the game.
2) Our contribution to her expenses would be ONLY for tuition, room and board. Everything else was on her. She would have to use her own savings and income from summer jobs to pay for books, supplies, and any fun spending money she needed. She would get nothing extra from us...no allowance at all.
3) She received a renewable merit scholarship that requires her to maintain a specific GPA to get that money every year. Her job is to KEEP that scholarship...we do not have extra in our budget to cover that if she loses it, so she needs to keep her grades up to hang on to that funding source.
We didn't just let her 'figure it out' on her own though. We sat down with her and showed her how to take the funds she had and work a budget for her freshman year. We helped her lay out how much she should plan to spend each week for various things, and told her to use that new laptop she got to keep track of every penny she spent in various categories. Every six weeks or so, she'd let us know where her budget was at. At every break, she sat down with us to go over her numbers and see where she could make adjustments. This process turned her into a very smart shopper, always looking for bargains and also giving her the strength to say "no" to extra spending because she knew she had to meet her budget.
She sees the college bills. She knows how much we're spending. And using/managing her OWN money has taught her how much it stinks to see that bank balance go down.
No, there are only eight Ivy League schools (wait -- is it 8, or is it 10? I forget), and U-M is not one of them. You're proving my earlier point: People throw around the term "Ivy League" when they really mean "excellent school, among the best in the country".Ah, I'm not sure where you are getting this idea from. U-M is considering "public ivy" and is consistently ranked as one of the best universities in the country.
As a person who has done a lot of hiring, it DID matter where you went to school. Certain universities have much better programs for certain disciplines than others.
And your school doesn't matter for every profession. For example, a first-year teacher needs to have earned a teaching license and good references from student teaching. Same for a nurse: Passing the state tests matters more than the school name. An engineer who can talk about having done a good internship will trump another recent graduate from a more prestigious school. Yet in other jobs, just the opposite is true.
)