Help me decide- BC or BWI

mco-missy

Mouseketeer
Joined
Oct 16, 2001
Messages
183
You guys are always the best when I have a choice to make!

Here's the story:
We are going to Disney for half of our honeymoon in May. We had booked POFQ (have stayed there before). Well, it's closed. We have narrowed down our choices from that relocation to BC or BWI (we love the Boardwalk area and EPCOT). We will not use the pool much since my fiance doesn't swim. So, what we are looking for is being close to Epcot and a "quiet" room. Which one, BC or BWI, would you choose?

Thanks so much for all of your help. We are so excited about staying in a deluxe and being on the boardwalk!
 
I've stayed at both, I would select BWI. I think there are more kids at BC because of Stormalong Bay, so BWI would be more quiet. There are more restaurants on the BW side - ESPN, Spoodles, Flying Fish. There's a bakery & ice cream store. Also Jellyrolls if you like a nightclub type place. Both are close to Epcot and you can walk or boat to both Epcot & MGM.
 
I would also say BWI. It is a lovely resort and we found the staff to be very friendly and helpful. We visited the BC for breakfast and for kids club and definately found it to be much busier with tons of kids around (we have kids too but like a more sedate atmosphere). The SAB pool is definately cool but the Luna Park pool is nice too. Even if your DF doesn't swim you might still visit the pool or have a drink at the pool bar. BWI has a nice, quiet bar, The Bellvue too. The atmosphere on the BW at night is really fun and great resturants.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom