nowellsl said:I was referring to the author of the book - not dvcgirl! I do agree the big ticket items save more money.
No worries, I didn't take it personally or anything. I do think the author has a valid point. Many spend so much time looking for bargains on the little things. I know a few people who are having financial troubles and they do this to the point of obsession. They're living in houses that they can't afford, driving cars that they have no business leasing and run all over the place looking for the cheapest gallon of gas, or the great deal on paper towels. I guess in some sense it makes people feel that they are in control....when in reality they are spiraling out of control.
One interesting point in All Your Worth is how the authors suggest you pay down CC debt and loans that you are obligated to pay. They have you use all of your savings (except $1,000 for emergencies and 401K/IRA money) to pay it off. Personally, I agree, except I'd have someone continue to contribute to their 401K up until the point that there's a match from the employer.
Once that is paid off you go to Tier 2, which is to build 6 months of your "Must Haves". That's interesting because lots of financial types call for a straight 6 months of salary, whereas they have you build enough to pay the bills you must pay for six months. I think that makes more sense actually. For so many people, the thought of saving six whole months of their salary is overwhelming. This plan has you save half that, because your "Must Haves" should never go beyond 50% of your take home pay.
Once you reach that point, they break down the 20% of your take-home pay that is to go into savings. 10% to retirement. 5% to go towards paying off your mortgage more quickly. And the other 5% is your "Dream Money". They throw college into that category. I'm sure that some people will disagree with that.
These authors say it's *never* a good idea to do a cash-out finance or home equity loan. And in 95% of the cases I'd say that's true....unless you're a savvy financial type. 2/3 of the people who pull out equity to pay off CC debt are back in trouble within 2 years. That's our OP to a tee...
They also hate borrowing against the home just because interest rates are low to use the money to invest elsewhere. They just don't advocate borrowing against your home because it's simply too risky in most cases.
They use the Dave Ramsey argument to answer the question for those who ask whether it's best to pay off your house... "what about the tax write-off for mortgage interest?" They answer...
"A tax credit is no reason to prolong your mortgage payments! Think of it this way....if you were a professional gambler, your gamgling losses would be tax-deductible. But does that mean a gambler wants to lose money? No way!"
They go on...
"Still not convinced? Consider the math. Let's say you're paying $1,000 a month, $700 goes to interest and $300 goes to principle. You would save $200 on your taxes. So you want to keep paying $1,000 to the bank so that you can save $200? Of course not. Math like that will drive you to the poorhouse in a hurry."