I'm simply not convinced that AD is dead. I was surprised when my sister called me and said the same thing

We simply do not believe for a second that Snape has turned. I may be wrong, but I'm usually pretty darn good at picking up on endings...also why I can't get through a mystery all the way
1) AD was sick/dying from the poison he drank to retrieve the horcrux (he kept telling Harry to go get Snape to help him.) It strikes me that it's always possible that there was something about this, that both he and Snape knew (Snape being such a master at potions...and antidotes, dark arts) the only way to SAVE AD was to kill him first. That's not as likely, b/c how would snape know unless he could see tell tale physical signs of the poison. More likely is that Snape told AD all about the Unbreakable promise, and knew all of this could happen, and AD planned some sort of protection that would make everyone think he was dead, so that Snape could still stay a double agent and not be suspected. Remember, Snape and AD argued...perhaps AD was saying "you must" and Snape was saying "but I can't!". Plus, they went OVER AND OVER the whole thing about making spells without saying a word...and they were sure to say a few times that Dumbledore was very good at that. Perhaps he did that just before Snape did the curse. Remember at the funeral when the beir bursts into flames, and Harry thinks he sees a phoenix? Don't forget, a phoenix dies, but rises from the flames anew. Then immediately after the flames die away, we see the "corpse" is suddenly in a white tomb...aka cocoon? Get the symbolism..way heavy in the whole "rebirth" thing.
2) Remember how MUCH Rowlings played up the death of Sirius? I mean, HUGE emotional reactions, pages of gut wrenching description of sorrow. From a description stand point, Dumbledores death was, by comparison, almost an aside! They spent more time in the infirmary recapping what had happened and the whole werewolf thing, then they did Dumbledore! And AD was a MUCH bigger character then Sirius. I just think she didn't play it up nearly as much, and that is because she has something up her sleeve with AD.
3) I was actually disappointed with this book to a degree. There was very little in the way of big revelations, and she's still relying on this standard format of the book (this book, I felt like I was only reading it to get to the ending.) It felt like this book was a little TOO heavy in the romance department...sure, all of those were fun: Harry & Ginny, Ron & Lavendar, then Ron & Hermione, Luna & Remus, Bill and..err..french girl whose name I can't remember. It was like she just wanted to get it out of the way so she could get to meat of things in the last book.
4) I absolutely believe that we will find out Voldemort is related to Harry in some way. Rowling has mentioned too many times how much Harry looks like Voldemort...sure you can explain some of their connections b/c of their initial battle, BUT remember: they also say Harry looks JUST like his father! We have never heard anything about Harry's father's family, other then that he's supposedly pure blood. Rowling sure spent ALOT of time going into Voldemorts family background for that to not be leading us somewhere important. Now Harry says in the end he is going to return to where he was born, and see his parent's graves...something's going to happen there in regards to that, I can feel it
Ok, go ahead, call me crazy...I already had a spirited debate over this
