Not sure what's going on. Residential property is still hot in Silicon Valley. Many still want to live there even if they work from home.
I'm wondering if we understand the same thing. The city of Santa Clara owned the land since the 1980s and leased it to a number of operators including Kings Entertainment, Paramount, and Cedar Fair. Cedar Fair bought the land in 2019, making them both the tenant and landlord. I would have thought that they would have just killed the lease, since it creates weird tax issues. I wonder what would happen if a residential tenant buys out the landlord and just keeps the lease in place where they're just paying themselves, but are supposed to pay tax on the rental income. That's the part that didn't make sense to me, although I supposed with a business the rental income and the rental expense cancel each other out.
So now Cedar Fair is selling to Prologis, which is required to lease back for up to 11 years, but it could be sooner.