Mississippian said:
Tjkraz,
I visited the Beach Club on rented points in February. Since that time I have purchased 200 points at BWV, which is my first purchase. While at the BCV I met two different couples going to and from the parks who had purchased at SSR but did so mainly in hopes of staying at other resorts.
Two comments:
1. That hardly makes them unique. Most people who have bought direct from DVC bought whichever resort was offered at the time. There are owners at every resort who dislike their Home and consistenly stay elsewhere
2. I'm no statistician, but I don't really think that conversations with two couples is a good basis for concluding that "A very substantial percentage of SSR purchasers really don't want to stay there."
I have also read quite a few posts on these boards from other SSR purchasers who have said the same thing.
And I can confidently say that there are many, many times that number of reports from SSR owners who were thrilled with their Home and look forward to many years of staying there. There are also many reports from non-SSR owners who loved their stay and look forward to returning.
I realize that tastes can differ, but it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that for MOST people resorts such as BCV, BWV and VWL are far more appealing than SSR.
Please open your eyes and realize that your idea of "far more appealing" does not necessarily match that of 90,000 others.
* Do BCV or VWL have a Community Hall?
* Do BCV or VWL have Grand Villas?
* Do any of those resorts have parking right outside of the unit?
* Do any of those resorts have a golf clubhouse on property?
* Are any of those resorts within walking distance of Downtown Disney?
* Do any of those resorts have a spa / workout facility even remotely comparable to SSR?
* Do any of those resorts have in-room furnishings that can hold a candle to SSR? (Speaking as someone who's stayed at BCV, BWV and SSR, the answer is "no")
* Do any of those resorts have a basketball court? (Not a huge issue but I play 3+ times per week so it's important to me.)
Why are BWV, BCV and VWL so inferior in the areas detailed above? If you want to talk inferior, take a look at the (not so) prime real estate on which the Beach Club and Wilderness Lodge Villas were constructed. Heck, I'll take any room at SSR over the BCV "road view" or the VWL "dumpster view."
Even if you want to debate transportation, we usually have a car while on vacation. I can drive from SSR to MGM faster than you can walk there from BCV.
I realize that some people don't like eating out or having easy access to the parks, and for them SSR might be a great option.
But for the rest of us, the sheer volume of SSR units is going to be terrible, and will make it very difficult to get a non-SSR reservation within the seven-month window.
Well, then let me throw a monkey into your wrench. I fall into the "rest of us" category, but will be staying at SSR even more in the future after my recent lackluster visit to BWV. Go figure.
Will it get harder to book those resorts inside of 7 months? Sure will. But you've got you 7 month window and that's all that was ever promised. To imply that BCV, BWV and VWL will be near 100% capacity before there are any significant bookings at SSR is ludicrous. And, if you're actually convinced that will happen, it sounds like you made the mistake in buying in the first place.
If you choose to refer to SSR as an "inferior product" and imply that it is not among the "decent" resorts, just realize that you represent a group of ONE. You aren't even an SSR owner yourself, so I don't see how you can claim to speak for that "very substantial percentage" of owners.