LongLiveDisney
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,261
chobie said:It was a joke.
I see.
chobie said:It was a joke.
I was married 20 years ago last October.
My husband asked my Dad for my hand in marriage(my mom had passed away 6 months earlier). My Dad went shopping with me for my wedding dress. My Dad walked me down the aisle and he was asked "who gives this woman in marriage?" and he cried and answered "I do".
I never even crossed my mine that I was property. The only thing that crossed my mind was that I was loved. My husband was so concerned about that our wedding would be too soon after my Mom's death that he wanted Dad to be okay with it. I will always cherish the pictures that I have of my Dad walking me down the aisle and giving me a hug and kiss and putting my veil back.
That was love.
Why are men and women treated differently when it comes to the ceremony? Why is it respectful for the man to ask the bride's father for permission but not for the her to ask his parents?
Don't we care about our sons as much? If the meaning has changed and these rituals are about respect rather than daughter's being property, then why are we not extending this same respect to our sons?
bunkkinsmom said:In answer to your second question, if it is the man proposing, then he should be the one to ask. If the bride proposes to the groom, I see it as the same, and she should ask his parents.
This is an interesting concept. So if the woman proposes, should the man be the one escorted down the aisle? By his mother? Father?
kidding![]()
Wouldn't your wedding band essentially indicate possession that you are against?? You "belong" to your husband. The ring signifies this. OR could it be viewed as a symbol of you love for each other? Imo walking a daughter down the asile can signify love vs possession. Not everything is so black and white.
Sent from my Samsung S3 using DISBoards
Jaya said:At my best friend's wedding, her father got so flustered that when asked "who giveth this woman to be married", he answered "her mother and father and I do." We razzed him about that for years.
I have a son. Don't presume that you know anything about the respect issue when it comes to each individual family. Are you truly asking these questions or is this your way of trying to make a point?
IN MY OPINION men and women are treated differently because WE ARE DIFFERENT. Flame me if you will, but we are different. I personally enjoy having doors held open for me. I enjoyed being walked down the aisle by my father. I enjoy cooking Thanksgiving dinner while my DH and FIL watch football (with my SIL by the way). Can I open my own doors? Can I walk myself down the aisle? Can I recite more football stats than anyone else in that room? Abso-freakin-lutely. But why on earth do I need to prove that to anyone? I teach my son to stand and give ladies his seat in appropriate situations. I teach my son to hold doors open for women. My son will be taught to ask a father before proposing.
I will answer your previous questions in hopes that they are truly questions:
Websters defines "ceremony": : a formal act or series of acts prescribed by ritual, protocol, or convention.
Using that definition, each participant has a role to ply according to ritual, protocol, or convention. So that's why they are treated differently.
In answer to your second question, if it is the man proposing, then he should be the one to ask. If the bride proposes to the groom, I see it as the same, and she should ask his parents.
I believe I have already answered your last two.
To all the people who don't understand the need to think about these things, I would offer that the sexist traditions of marriage ceremonies are actually quite pervasive when taken together:
(Note: I am not saying everyone does these things. But they are all traditional.)
- The man asks permission/approval/for the blessing of the father.
approval and permission are two very different things.
- The man asks the woman to get married. She can range between hopeful of the proposal, or surprised, but it is his decision.
But the answer is not. She can say no, so technically, she is the decision maker. Sort of gives her the power in the relationship.
- Women receive an engagement ring. It starts on day one. Why is the tradition that you wear a ring that marks you as taken, while he wears nothing?
It's a gift. Not all history comes from ownership. Some believed that the veins running in the 3rd finger of the left hand ran straight to the heart.
- The woman has a shower to "set up her new home."
I'm not sure why this is bad? A woman's friends gathering around her to give her presents to help "set up her new home"?
- Men have a stag, because they have to have a last night out before they chain themselves to a woman. (Yes, stagettes/hens nights are more common now.)
It's only been in the last few decades that this has been the case. The history of this began with a dinner for the grooms friends to toast his marriage. It has only recently become the "party" that we know now.
- Women plan the wedding. It is a pivotal day in their lives, taking months or years to plan. They have dreamed about it and imagined it. Most men just show up.
that's not really a ritual. Weddings used to be simple ceremonies where the dress was passed down from Mother to Daughter. Only recently have they become events that needed huge planning.
- Women have rituals associated with preparing to wed. They wear something borrowed, etc. to bring the marriage luck. In many cultures there is a cleansing ritual to purify the woman. Men get dressed.
Simply not true. Many cultures have rituals involving the men. Something old represents continuity with the bride's family. Something new represents their new life together. Something borrowed is supposed to be from a family member or friend that has a happy marriage. Something blue represented the color of the Virgin Mary's robe and symbolized purity. One of the earliest versions of this rhyme also included "and a sliver sixpence in her shoe". In Scotland, the groom would put a silver sixpence in his shoe to symbolize financial security. Over time it moved to her shoe.
- The tradition that the brides parents pay for the wedding, while the grooms parents skate by relatively unscathed, has troubling roots in dowries.
Actually it symbolized the man taking over the finances in the relationship.
- Women are given away/escorted/presented. Men stand on their own.
We've been over that.
- The veil is lifted, a tradition rife with symbolism.
There is more than one explanation. In the Middle Ages, the veil was thought to keep away curses.
- In some ceremonies women promise to obey.
The Bible says obey for the women and directs men to love their wives as Jesus loves the church. It's not a mandated vow, as many here have attested to.
- "You many now kiss the bride." The man initiates the marriage.
Ancient Romans sealed every contract with a kiss. It was not considered legal until this happened.
- Women change their title from Miss to Mrs. Because their status has changed. Men, however, remain the same. Their marital status is not disclosed through their title.
It was to announce a woman's marital status to prospective men. That way a man would know right up front if a woman was available for courtship. Back then, a woman would not proposition a man, so there would be no need for him to announce his status.
- Woman change their last name, sometimes becoming Mrs. HisFristName HisLastName. In surveys many men would outright refuse to take a woman's last name. Some men refuse to marry if the woman doesn't change her name. It's important to them. Yet if a man feels it makes him less somehow to change his name, logically it follows that a woman is less for changing hers.
This one definitely dates back to change of property.
- The woman tosses her bouquet so that one unfortunate, single women can hopefully be married soon, too.
Women used to rip the clothing from the bride in order to obtain her "luck". The bride would toss her bouquet as an offering so that she could run away. And why is the recipient unfortunate? Why is marriage a bad thing?
I am not saying any of these things is wrong, or that the symbolism hasn't or can't change. But the traditions of marriage are very sexist and patriarchal. To dismiss those who think about these things as "over thinking" is, in my opinion, just wrong. Traditions and history should be thought about. I might take the opposite view and say that those who follow tradition simply for traditions sake do so unthinkingly and blindly, not knowing what they participate in or why.
Again, just to be clear, I don't think the modern versions if some of these traditions are bad. I just also don't think that considering them, thinking about them, is bad either.
Well, yes, they were "truly" questions.as you can see from my prior posts,if I wanted to make a statement, I would do just that.
As Ember pointed out below, it's ok to question rituals and traditions.
Seems to me anyone who felt completely comfortable with these double standards would not be getting peeved about others questioning them.
bunkkinsmom said:Not sure why you think I'm getting peeved?
Planogirl said:I'm very independent and always have been. I believe in equality and treating people the same as much as possible.
However I see this type of thing as a harmless tradition. I'm more concerned over whether women will be treated fairly in the workplace and so on than an old-fashioned question asked at a wedding.
IheartMickey said:I haven't even read the entire post because it just goes down hill. I think many of you just like to argue. Why the heck get so heated about something that doesn't pertain to you at all? If you don't like it, don't do it at your wedding. Simple.
As for my own opinion, it's been done at all the weddings I've been to. I don't see the harm in it. I will be taking 'obey' out of my wedding vows though. That's just a personal choice and I don't care if other people decide to use it or not.