skelooch
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2002
- Messages
- 2,208
You're missing the point, perhaps we're not explaining it properly.
An airline isn't "stupid" when they follow a practice they found assists them in running a profitable business.
Historically the lack of assigned seats got passengers to the gate early, contributing to fast turnaround.
SW tested assigned seats and found their core passengers prefer the present system.
Assigned seats are complicated. An airline has to decide how many seats to block out for their elite fliers. How many seats to block out for gate assignment. Do they let a couple book an aisle and window seat, hoping for an empty middle seat. An increasing number of airlines are charging for assigned seats. Passengers who don't pay are worse off then a SW passengers. A lot of threads are from passengers who don't want to pay for an assigned seat but still think the airline should sit their family together.
I agree most DIS don't care if an airline is profitable. You said SWs boarding process is so stupid that a dictionary should use it to define the word stupid.
You don't have to like SWs boarding. You don't have to fly SW. A profitable airline is rare. Certainly not stupid.
I don't think too much of Spirit. Charge for checked luggage. Charge for carryon bags. They will be charging for bags over 40 lbs,industry standard is 50 lbs. Get those passengers who don't read the fine print. I don't think Spirit is stupid. They found a model that works for them.
I appreciate your thoughts on SW reasons for doing what they do, I just don't think it works as well as some of the other airlines.
Let's just agree to disagree, and move on, I think we just about beat it to death.