i remember when the clintons called him this. all the democrats thought it was so appropriate because it told everyone about his background and it was implied that his name meant something that was no good. that was 1992. fast forward 16 years and they are using barack hussein obama for the same reason, and the same people that thought it was no big deal(why should he be ashamed of his name?) now call it unfair? am i missing something here?
Are those names supposed to ring a bell, because I have no idea.
(I guess other posters are saying the idea was that using the full name would bring up associations of being rich and an aristocrat. Is it supposed to be merely the # of names or the particular names he has that are supposed to bring up that association? I can't say I've ever made the association before.)