I will have to go back and find and read it. Was out today reading this on my phone.
Was this a different witness than “Christopher”?
Why would they all concur with what happened in the police report if it was different?
Is this the gaslighting that people were referring to?
Just trying to figure this all out after shopping and while getting dinner ready.![]()
I was trying to keep it straight myself it quickly got twisted up. I think the gaslighting the poster who brought it up was maybe thinking that she hit him but it was because he was egging her on??? I guess?? I'm not sure.Is this the gaslighting that people were referring to?
Hmmm that is something to think aboutI'm wondering if what this man witnessed was Brian defending himself since he does admit that he shoved her when she was hitting him.
I agree, maybe that's why tensions got up in the last few pages. Hard to keep track of the sources and what they said and what people were sayingI am really starting to get confused in keeping what I read in news articles and here straight.
I think we were all in agreement about this? I thought the thread had a general thought that yes he probably knew at least where she last seen even if he didn't know where her body was so he should have told the police, told the parents, his parents shouldn't have covered if they did, they should have told the police the moment he left. I think we all think a lot of this stuff is suspicious. The mental health conversation didn't mean that people didn't view his actions as not suspicious but just that things can happen that you might not even think was possible. No he didn't help her but I think we all felt this way. Oh it's hard to keep up but that was the overall vibe I got from this thread that posters agreed on much of what you touched on.HE came home ALIVE and she did not. At the VERY LEAST he knows/knew where he last saw her and could have told her parents and/or the police that much. Instead he holed up at his parents’ home and then they let him take off without notifying the police as soon as he left.
If anyone thinks that’s not suspicious... sheesh, I don’t know what to tell you, but mental illness or no, IT’S SUSPICIOUS, and there really should be no debate about that. MAYBE he didn’t kill her (highly doubtful IMO) but he sure as heck didn’t help her.
I agree with most of what you’ve said here.I think we were all in agreement about this? I thought the thread had a general thought that yes he probably knew at least where she last seen even if he didn't know where her body was so he should have told the police, told the parents, his parents shouldn't have covered if they did, they should have told the police the moment he left. I think we all think a lot of this stuff is suspicious. The mental health conversation didn't mean that people didn't view his actions as not suspicious but just that things can happen that you might not even think was possible. No he didn't help her but I think we all felt this way. Oh it's hard to keep up but that was the overall vibe I got from this thread that posters agreed on much of what you touched on.
The recent conversations were because newer information was coming about because the other stuff was days old at this point in discovery of knowing, even as high tension as it got, I think that's a fair discussion to have.
what doctor would diagnosis anxiety with out giving meds I was 21 and I don’t remember getting a choice in the matter
Thank you so much for your response! You are right if it's in a police report how could his attorney not use that as part of his defense. I think like the other person mentioned that witness that saw him touch her physically that could also be used but against him but also for him just depending on how other information fits in.Sure. I did post about this several other times in this thread, as well, but I know it’s hard to catch every word on something like this. Plus, we’re all reading different things and watching different shows, etc. So things can overlap.
But my reading of the police incident was that she was the aggressor, and in a state of manic behavior at that time.
His touching her was not hitting her, per se, but his moves were defensive when she was hitting him. She hit him in the face with her phone and scratched his face. He also had scratches on his arms from her grabbing his arms while he was driving the van (which caused the van to swerve). He had no visible injuries that I recall.
The police felt that they were dealing with a “mental health crisis”; both admitted to having mental health issues without being treated with medication but none of us know exactly what they are at this time (other than what was listed that they admitted to in the police report).
I’m not sure where people are getting their information that “he hit her”, except if maybe they read different sources than what I read. However, there is little doubt that that police report - in which she was deemed the aggressor - will be a big part of his defense, IMO.
Absolutely. I have been thinking all day about all of those involved with this. So devastating. I am very glad she was found. We have a friend of the family whose son went missing back in the 1970s and has never been found. The not knowing has been excruciating for them.Thank you so much for your response! You are right if it's in a police report how could his attorney not use that as part of his defense. I think like the other person mentioned that witness that saw him touch her physically that could also be used but against him but also for him just depending on how other information fits in.
This case has me going from ups and downs. I was saddened to hear about them finding her body (their confidence in finding her body at least) but then at least was relieved she's not still missing. I thought at this point it was going to be pretty hard to find her alive but the thought of her maybe still out there helpless would have me in knots too.
what doctor would diagnosis anxiety with out giving meds I was 21 and I don’t remember getting a choice in the matter
It's also important to remember that the autopsy procedure is not the end of the medical examiner's investigation. It's actually just the second phase, following the on-scene work. A lot of what goes on in an autopsy procedure is just collecting samples from the corpse. Those samples are then examined to see what, if anything, they tell us.
If the cause of death is not obvious, it could very well be 4-6 weeks before the autopsy results are determined...much less released.
We have a friend of the family whose son went missing back in the 1970s and has never been found. The not knowing has been excruciating for them.
You're right. It's odd to have this sort of conflicting information or maybe not? I'll trust the police and FBI have an easier time keeping it all straight but I'm sitting here confused.So once again, we have conflicting information. I guess we will just have to see how it all plays out.
It's not odd at all; it's the norm in very high-profile cases like this. The media is desperate for any scrap of info and they make a huge deal out of every little tidbit...most of which turns out to be completely irrelevant.That is so sad
You're right. It's odd to have this sort of conflicting information or maybe not? I'll trust the police and FBI have an easier time keeping it all straight but I'm sitting here confused.
The Moab Police announced that there was NO connection between the murders of the two women in Moab and Gabby/Brian.I know there was talks of that other couple found murdered, do we have any more information on that or is it that for now they have no connection to each other (I remember seeing there was a brief moment of thinking there was a connection but then it was said there is not).
Thanks for that informationIt's not odd at all; it's the norm in very high-profile cases like this. The media is desperate for any scrap of info and they make a huge deal out of every little tidbit...most of which turns out to be completely irrelevant.
The Moab Police announced that there was NO connection between the murders of the two women in Moab and Gabby/Brian.
I think conflicting, somewhat conflicting or information that isn't complete is not that unusual.That is so sad
You're right. It's odd to have this sort of conflicting information or maybe not? I'll trust the police and FBI have an easier time keeping it all straight but I'm sitting here confused.
I know there was talks of that other couple found murdered, do we have any more information on that or is it that for now they have no connection to each other (I remember seeing there was a brief moment of thinking there was a connection but then it was said there is not).
I don’t know too, too much about it, other than that there were some coincidences with both cases. Like, one of the women murdered worked at the store around where this same incident with the police occurred with Gabby and Brian. That couple also were somewhat nomadic and #vanlife followers. I could’ve sworn at the time of the incident with the other couple I’d seen some references to a drifter who was living in a tent who had a large cache of weapons and I think was brought in for questioning, but not much came of it. I also want to say that police in the area offered a warning to others staying in the area to watch out for themselves. That’s about all I know. I don’t know anything about the two other males who have been reported missing from the area. Does anyone know anything more about that? It does seem that there are some scary things happening there.I know there was talks of that other couple found murdered, do we have any more information on that or is it that for now they have no connection to each other (I remember seeing there was a brief moment of thinking there was a connection but then it was said there is not).
Since we're talking about odd or unusual I'm sure this warning isn't unusual but with so many people completely changing their lifestyles with this pandemic (and I'm not sure I can blame them) and with how people's reactions have been this year (seems to have been mostly this year you're hearing about terrible behavior from people) it makes me a bit uneasy. Living off the grid seems more risky now but that really could just be my own perception only.I also want to say that police in the area offered a warning to others staying in the area to watch out for themselves.
I think we were all in agreement about this? I thought the thread had a general thought that yes he probably knew at least where she last seen even if he didn't know where her body was so he should have told the police, told the parents, his parents shouldn't have covered if they did, they should have told the police the moment he left. I think we all think a lot of this stuff is suspicious. The mental health conversation didn't mean that people didn't view his actions as not suspicious but just that things can happen that you might not even think was possible. No he didn't help her but I think we all felt this way. Oh it's hard to keep up but that was the overall vibe I got from this thread that posters agreed on much of what you touched on.
The recent conversations were because newer information was coming about because the other stuff was days old at this point in discovery of knowing, even as high tension as it got, I think that's a fair discussion to have.
Agreed and like another poster said they don't always prescribe them either. I also agree with another poster pages back people also self-medicate. I don't think they mentioned doing this (could be wrong) but that does happen.Just because someone isn’t taking meds doesn’t mean a doctor didn’t prescribe meds. We only know they each told the police that they don’t take meds for their conditions, we have no idea if they were ever prescribed them.