DisneyMommyMichelle
A Maelstromer From Way Back...
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2005
- Messages
- 29,351
HAHAHAHAH!! I am dying about the chick-fil-a application!!!
Reminds me of when Lucy and Ethel sold raffle tickets to support the Ladies Overseas Aid so that they could go to Europe with Ricky and Fred. Said Lucy to Ethel, "We're ladies, we wanna go overseas and boy, do we need aid "!


didn't even take a second to think about it before I said 'well then, why don't you crunch your numbers each year and figure out what the maximum amount you need for this is-then bundle the cost across the board in the form of increased tuition. the looks I got from the board members and pto leaders were like

-'NO,NO,NO-WE CANT RAISE OUR TUITION, WE WANT IT TO BE AFFORDABLE FOR THE LARGEST AMOUNT OF PEOPLE IN THE AREA WE SERVE'-my response was 'it's not affordable-it's bait and switch, you are putting into contracts that tuition equals x amount of dollars per years but leaving out that there are mandatory fundraising activities that require student families to kick in several hundreds of dollars per year more-hasn't it caught your attention when we always lose a small chunk of students through disenrollment when these extra expenses become known to their parents? if it costs for EVERYTHING $$$$$ per year then tell it like it is, spell it out and people can look to see if they can afford the monthly payments, but don't tell them it only costs $$$$ per year and turn around starting the first week of school sending the kids home with fund raising materials they are mandated to sell a minimum amount on-it blows up a person's budget, and allot of parents of kids in private schools are already struggling to afford the tuition, the books, the uniforms........if they know up front what a cost is then they can evaluate if they can manage it and incorporate it into their family budgets.
I can't add anymore do to posting guidelines however you get the picture.My DD has taken two mission trips with her church over spring break. They spent a couple days building chicken coops, a day leading a vacation bible school at a church, and a day at an infirmary talking to patients. They had one "fun" day at the beach. The church does the "envelope" thing. 100 envelopes with the numbers 1-100 on it. If you take the envelope with the number 1 on it, you're expected to put $1 (can put more) in the envelope and return it. If you take the 55 envelope, you're expected to put $55 (or more) in the envelope and return it.
.
I understand not everyone can afford things--and really I want kids from less affluent backgrounds to still get to do things like band trips or whatnot---but I think there are better ways to raise funds than just, well, begging (or demanding as the case may be).
I am OK with groups selling things--preferably something I actually want for a fair price (for me that can include some of the Tupperware fundraisers, girl scout cookies, and always SCRIP gift cards for places I shop anyway), or snacks (bake sale) made by the kids and sold at an event where i am likely to want a snack, or well crafted hand made items sold by the kids (birdhouses, etc).
For teens--I really prefer them offering some sort of service in exchange for funds--signing up to work as vendors at a local stadium, or running a car wash,setting up a fun evening for kids and offering a parent's night out, etc.
Our church's youth group in Michigan did car washes---the first Sunday of the month, if you wanted your car washed you left it in the line up with the keys and a donation in it, and by the time services were out your car was clean and parked (by the adult advisers who had keys for pick up down by the coffee in the basement after services). It was fabulous!
Even then, I probably would not support the kind of trip that involves offering low skill "service" in impoverished areas instead of hiring locals. A visit to see another culture? Sure--I am very good with that. But show up to be some sort of "saviour" and increase the feeling that people need the west to come around and do things for them, instead of helping them help themselves--nope, not interested in perpetuating that.
Well, at least it wasn't an all-out cash grab like they OP's situation. They DID finagle an appliance store owner to donate a TV set, so the winner of the raffle got something of value. And IIRC, they did turn the money over to the charity at the end.
Don't remember what Plan B was to get the money to go to Europe. Was that when they dressed like Martian women and climbed the Empire State Building?
Pick an envelope, any envelope! Gosh, that sounds like a game of chance.The envelope idea is beyond ridiculous. The audacity to ask someone to randomly draw and then get stuck giving a donation up to 100! Thank goodness this is not popular where I am. I would refuse to even take a chance.
I guess it adds a little interest into the gimme money thing.That was a different episode (Lucy Is Envious) but glad to see you know Lucy!
I saw each episode at least 20 times, but it's been several years.
Now that I think about it, the Lucy Is Envious (Women from Mars) episode is when a snooty former classmate of Lucy's is collecting for charity. Lucy and Ethel pledge five, thinking it's $5, but are aghast when they realize the classmate meant $500. Lucy is too embarrassed to admit she can't afford $500, so they sign up for the Martian publicity stunt.
as far as 'mission trips' go I'm pretty particular on what I will contribute to-and they are few and far between.
we have several now young adults in our family ALL of whom either felt it their 'calling' or right to get to do a mission trip during college. 3 did shorter term 6 month or less placements, while 2 spent 2 years in the countries they went to with one of these then doing an 8 week program in yet another country.
the massive amounts of monies they solicited from friends, family and others was obscene but understandable when presented as to how it had to cover their airfare (there/back-and if they were to do a 2 year stint 2 more round trip tickets so they could 'go home' for a few weeks twice to spend with their families, food, appropriate clothing....). what for me wasn't/still isn't understandable was when we would get one of their constant group emails that detailed their 'works'-and how they were teaching young children who couldn't read or write in their own native language 'conversational english', math, writing and reading-again, all in English. these were kids in REMOTE areas where the only English speakers they were likely to encounter were other missionaries. just makes no sense to me. we also got emailed letters soliciting funds for different projects-and the letters would be filled with photos the missionary kids had taken when the 'went to play with the kids at the local orphanage' (not work there-they never did, they just went to play with the kids, hand out some candy and religious chachkis). the letters would tell about how just a few hundred dollars in total collections could provide phenomenally improved living conditions for the people in these remote areas......
all I could think was how much more phenomenal improvement could have been realized if instead of the tens of thousands these missionary kids raised to go to these place was instead raised and directly sent to agencies in place there for direct use with the inhabitants.
when I end up seeing photos posted on facebook or in printed albums at the proud parent's homes that are largely filled with photos of their kids doing what are clearly staged shots holding orphans, handing out candy to kids/scriptures to parents, but the bulk are from inside their air conditioned travel busses traveling to whatever depressed area is closest to the next 'must see' tourist destination (and lots of photos of those tourist destinations) it becomes very clear to me that any funds I can afford to donate would do much better going directly to those in need.