Squidgyness
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 28, 2010
- Messages
- 950
This is at the heart of the matter. Disney wants people to log in, purchase tickets 60 days in advance, choose a park, and commit to a certain length of stay.
Nobody would do that. So they need an incentive.
FP+ is it. This is all because of TSMM. Look at the craziness surrounding getting a FP+ there. Instead of seeing that amazing behavior and thinking - "We need to build another TSMM ride right next door to alleviate the madness and increase happiness", Disney saw a way of capitalizing on the consumer demand for those very valuable fastpasses.
Now Disney is going to try to make a lot more fastpasses valuable and then use that to get everyone to opt into their new ticketing, photo pass, and merchandising system.
If it works - and I imagine it will (people are still paying for the dining plan even after the food has been watered down, appetizers taken away, cost increased more than 50%, and tip was eliminated from the package) Disney will have a sweet, sweet system.
The talking goofy pictures in the hotel rooms, the delightful banter from the characters, the interactive queues are glitter.
But I agree! They could have still got everybody to use the magicband and mined the data by just having the interactive queues and experiences. So, the data is not the only reason for this...
Is fp+ really that much of an incentive?
Lets look at what you are getting ATM: 3 fastpasses that we know of in advance, that can't be used on any ride more than once.
Now. That's okay (let's assume that everyone using this new perk doesn't devalue its usage till its just another thing you do) but its no fantastic new attraction.
Just today I learned you can reserve seats at a show in seaworld for $30. Yeah it's steep. But let's say it was free, but you only got one usage and it was limited. Would you be more excited for that or the new Antarctica?
Look at universal. Say they had made their front of the line pass free to the first 1000 guests through the doors, onsite or not. Now, that's good, but would it have made the same impact on the industry as Harry potter did?
I don't think this is the thing that will launch WDW into the future as assured of the premier spot in people's minds. It is in many cases now, but often not. This new system might be a part of a counterattack to regain their position as by far the top innovator and ride builder, it might even be pretty good. But it's not as good as it needs to be to lure in significant numbers of guests and change their mindset IMO, and it certainly doesn't have the catchiness of a new attraction.
How can you market this without causing issues later? You need to get across that you can book rides in advance, but also include the limitations, or people will not be pleased when they discover them later on. I mean these aren't minor terms and conditions, they are full on limits on the basic service. It's like signing a phone contract for cheap calls then being told the total number of minutes are only 50 a month and you are locked in. Not the sort of image you want to give people.
"Mymagic+, personalisation at rides, order meals in advance, pay using a magicband (offsite guests must purchase) and advanced ride booking! (P.s. only three rides a day, one booking per person per ride.)" It just doesn't have that magic factor to it tbh. It's a marketers nightmare. It's so complicated, how much do you let people know?