First things first. The all important address!!
Michael Eisner
Walt Disney Corporation
500 S. Buena Vista Street
Burbank, California 91521
OK, now a couple of responses:
First thedscoop.
No. My point has always been that today's Disney is not any better or worse than a couple of decades ago.
Yeah, you might be right. When did Ei$ner take over. Hmmm. A couple decades ago (almost). Before that we were definitely in a stagnate period. But I contend that the situation that we find ourselves in today is
much worse. And do not forget, the
only reason that we were ripe for take over in the Walker/Miller days was because the film library and the parks (especially the Florida real estate holdings) were worth more apart than together! The parks were making money hand over fist! And don't kid yourself, we were taken over. From within.
No sir! I vehemently disagree! We were much better off (parks wise) several decades ago. The only thing that was need was a little forward movement. A plan for development. And in fairness to the Walker/Miller regime, that plan was already in effect. It was during their tenure that Touchstone was begun and The Little Mermaid was developed. Ei$ner inherited both.
It's just now we have these message boards to learn no info and critique more often and in greater detail.
You know, I really can't refute this with any hard evidence. All I can do is give you my personal perceptions and history. Very subjective, I know.
When I first started losing faith in Disney I had never even heard of the DIS, Laughing Place, MousePlanet, WDWBLUES, RADP or any of the other countless internet sites. I thought all these things up, all by myself, through direct observation. I was feeling more and more frustrated at the 'dumbing down' of the Disney experience. I was saddened by what they were doing to the "SHOW". I felt they were quickly, almost as if on purpose, becoming
well
I guess, 'ordinary' is the best term to describe it. I was never a huge Walt fan, I didn't care for Mickey cartoons, Disney movies were only tolerable, and I didn't know spit about the rest of the company. But I knew the parks!! Boy, oh boy, I knew the parks. And I was intimately acquainted with the "Disney Experience". I could spot a 'Disney Touch' a mile away.
So, it was years before I connected, on-line, that I saw the first signs of the slippery slope we are now racing down. And I wonder if your take might not be a little inaccurate. Of course it could be that we are discussing 'the chicken and the egg'. But I feel that the internet has become a place where people can vent. Those people already have their opinions. The 'net' just provides a forum where they can come together and grip about what's wrong with the personal laughing place. But the ideas and concepts are formed away from the computer screen.
Let's face it. It didn't take the internet to help form the opinions held by HBK, JeffJewell or Another Voice, did it? No!! These opinions were already there. And conversely, how many converts have all our words and great thoughts created? Is DisDuck or The Captain or yourself signed up to drive in the car pool? No!!
Now I will grant you that the internet is a remarkable tool for education. When I first entered this realm I didn't know that the unique Disney experience I had been enjoying for the past thirty years was called the "SHOW". I knew nothing about Traditions. And I have come to admire this man called Walt and even have a fondness for quoting him (thanks again AV)!! But the 'feeling' was already there. The opinion was already formed. And the 'net' had nothing to do with it.
And now the Captian!!
Eisner pays too much attention to core Disney and he's a hero to the purists but the stock plummets
I'm a purist. And in case I haven't made myself clear - I don't think he's a hero. Ever!
