Dizlvr
Registered
- Joined
- May 20, 2015
- Messages
- 910
Not being able to eat a particular food item is not a disability.
I believe allergies are considered a disability under the ADA
Not being able to eat a particular food item is not a disability.
Its called oral allergy syndrome. If a person has seasonal allergies to certain trees, they can get a reaction when eating raw fruits or vegetables that have similiar proteins. The body is tricked into thinking its the allergen.
Cooking changes the proteins that is why people can eat a cooked vegetable or fruit without any reaction. I'm not sure how long it has to be cooked, I guess just long enough to change the protein so the body isn't fooled by it.
My ds has this, and its a PIA because he was such a raw fruit lover when he was younger, now he can only eat blueberries raw.
Not being able to eat a particular food item is not a disability. You have other options to eat. While not allergic to ice cream it does cause a reaction in that my stomach grows. So I am disabled right?
I am not limited nor do I consider myself disabled. I served my country and suffered a minor setback. No one forced me to go overseas and I expect no one to alter their everyday life for me.
My son has it with strawberries and I JUST discovered that I either have this or another type of allergy to eggplant! I can't remember ever having it before(just not something I'm regularly around to try) and DH's cousin grilled some the other day. Simple salt, pepper, olive oil(so I know it wasn't any spices)...My lips were itchy, red and swollen.Yep, I have this only with raw apples and raw almonds (which are apparently in the same family of something or other that makes them related). It sucks because I love apples but I can't eat them raw or my mouth will be so itchy.
Its called oral allergy syndrome. If a person has seasonal allergies to certain trees, they can get a reaction when eating raw fruits or vegetables that have similiar proteins. The body is tricked into thinking its the allergen.
Cooking changes the proteins that is why people can eat a cooked vegetable or fruit without any reaction. I'm not sure how long it has to be cooked, I guess just long enough to change the protein so the body isn't fooled by it.
My ds has this, and its a PIA because he was such a raw fruit lover when he was younger, now he can only eat blueberries raw.
BTW, I was liking your explanation, not that fact that your kid can only eat blueberries.Mine has the same, it's really frustrating...
I also have the raw onion thing. It also just started in the past few years. Ree Drumond (Pioneer Woman) is also bothered by them and she soaks them before using them and swears it helps. I have never tried it, but plan to someday. Normally I just pick them out unless they are diced and then I just stop eating what they were in.
My ds has had it for years but he's been trying to re-introduce fruit into his diet and some things don't bother him as much anymore. He ate watermelon and bananas recently and he said he didn't get itchy so we tried a few other fruits but unfortunately they bothered him. I guess there is hope that it will go away on its own.
Mine has had it for years too. But went the opposite way. He recently developed an anaphylactic reaction to watermelon. So now he's supposed to avoid everything he's ever had a reaction to (the list is quite long).
So, here's the issue. My daughter has a class 6 peanut allergy. You can google that to find out what it means, but in a nutshell, she is AS allergic, by blood, as you can be to peanuts. She's a 100 out of 100. We spent 12 years managing it and, let me tell you, it's not easy. Yes, we avoided some restaurants for years because they just weren't safe. Dd had to skip five guys or texas road house. It was too dangerous. She recently completed desensitization and life is a lot different for her now and we're thankful for how much easier her and our lives are.
When you start talking about food allergies, people start making the "wise" suggestion to "not go there" or "keep your kids at home" or "homeschool". They want to know how we "go to the playground" or do any normal things. The answer is, we have to do a great amount of risk assessment to decide what is worth it and what isn't. It's awful. I wouldn't wish it on anyone. Ever.
It is nearly impossible to go someplace that has NO nuts at all. Dd was only allergic to peanuts (which are NOT nuts, btw) but all nuts were considered unsafe due to processing and cross contamination. We made adjustments. We asked questions. We talked to chefs and servers and managers to make sure dd was as safe as she could be. Why didn't we keep her home? Because that was no way to live and it was our job as her parents to guide her into living life as an allergic person.
Now, we never ever complained if it took longer to make sure her food was safe. That's stupid. Please, take your time. Wash things again. Double check. Be sure. Take all the time you need to help us help her. We're more than willing to wait. We understand that allergies might limit our menu. Again, that's okay. We understand. Please, double check again. Part of managing an allergy is being patient and managing risk. Please don't assume that because an allergic person dines someplace where his or her allergens are served means that they're not being safe and managing their allergy. That's just ignorant.
I also wonder if at some point some of the finer restaurants just stop accommodating those with allergies. The risk seems way to high of accidently killing someone.
I guess it would also mean people have to take personal responsibility and not demand special food.