DCTooTall
<MARQUEE BEHAVIOR=ALTERNATE><img src=http://www.em
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2008
- Messages
- 5,957
Darn Avatarland. For some reason I've always thought it was universal who did attractions like this- un disney related lol. I'm excited for avatarland, of course, but what about FotLK?!?!?!![]()
![]()
lol
Wwweeeeeelllllllllllllll.... To open up that can of worms, Even if you give credit to all the Pixar movies created when Disney's only real relationship with the company was the film's distributor...
Some attractions based off properties that have no connection to Disney outside the parks:
Star Tours (And Star Wars Weekends)
Indiana Jones (Stunt show in Florida, Ride in Cali)
Twilight Zone Tower of Terror
Multiple movies within the Great Movie Ride
Muppet 4-D (Now a Disney Property, but the Muppets were still Jim Henson when the show was introduced)
Power Rangers (Since Discontinued)
Teenage Mutant ninja Turtles (Also Discontinued)
.... Disney has just as much of a history of using Licensed properties within their parks as Universal. In Fact, I'd almost be willing to say their history of doing so pre-dates Universal's since Star Tours was introduced in the mid-80's. [Before Universal Florida, and I believe hollywood at that time still featured only things with direct Universal ties, but I could be wrong]
The Moral of this story? This isn't the first time Disney has used an outside IP within the parks.... and for the most part, They've had a pretty impressive track record of creating quality attractions with that IP.